Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Im looking at the 3 example Battlewagons on page 102. Is it me or are both Gorbad's Gobsmasha and Da Bonecruncha of Bork both miscalculated? I get 205 (instead of 210) for the Gobsmasha and 130 (instead of 140) for Da Bonecruncha. What am I missing?

Most likely. This is GW, they lack basic reading and math skills.

You sir are correct.

It is likely that they were using test rules when writing that part of the codex, and the points values were tweaked afterwards. It is why they arent actually rules....although the rules have enough, erm, interesting bits.

I've noticed a few math slip ups in the example army lists. They will take a unit of boys, and throw in a nob, but they are not paying for the correct number of models because a nob replaces a boy.