new big FAQ... what you expect they will change?

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Slayer-Fan123**

barboggo wrote:
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
barboggo wrote:
Sounds like CP batteries are a big issue for everyone based on the discussion here.

I feel like rule of 3 and deep strike rules have both been pretty successful. Competitive players will always min-max so naturally you see plenty of units of 3 for the most competitive, undercosted units. While the deep strike rules have hurt certain armies and units quite a bit, it did also completely get rid of the "deep strike everything turn 1 into rapid fire range, alpha strike army archetype" which I think is a good thing.

I just hope they do something to make melee more viable. I've actually been quite pleased with how bloodletters and Khorne daemon princes have seen a bit of a resurgence with the knight meta. Now if only they could somehow make a pure melee Khorne army work...

Except the Deep Strike thing wasn't an issue if you brought screens. It isn't my problem you didn't bring any.

I brought screens every time. Literally everyone did. And I think that was the issue. Mandatory T1 screens was kinda boring. Nowadays you only have to T1 screen against stuff like GSC Cult Ambush, which feels a lot more fluffy and cool.

Under your logic, bringing anti-tank or AA is boring every game.

Only some pure armies aren't able to do it effectively but otherwise it was an essential. Once again, my Predators aren't my problem if you don't bring something to kill them.

**Dysartes**

SHUPPET wrote:
Slipspace wrote:
Yeah, completely different Tony. It really isn't difficult to check this before spouting off rubbish in a forum - there like a 20-page thread about it on this very forum FFS.

Exactly this. This forum proves itself time and time again to be one of the scrubbiest places on the internet.

If you're going to keep complaining about the place, the door is over there *points*

**SHUPPET**

Dysartes wrote:
SHUPPET wrote:
Slipspace wrote:
Yeah, completely different Tony. It really isn't difficult to check this before spouting off rubbish in a forum - there like a 20-page thread about it on this very forum FFS.

Exactly this. This forum proves itself time and time again to be one of the scrubbiest places on the internet.

If you're going to keep complaining about the place, the door is over there *points*

Thanks, however I can have my complaints about the scrubby attitude from a lot of posters and still find enough reason within the quality ones to stay. Sorry if me pointing it out offends you. But you literally just witnessed two people trashing a great player's reputation for no other reason then the fact he shares a first name with someone else, with statements that are easily disproven within 10 seconds of googling, sooooo yeah.