| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/19 09:32:00
Subject: Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
Why almost nobody use hawks in their list today? why they are bad ? i am not skilled player and dont know yet whats good and bad in this game.
Hawks get almost storm bolters, wings, skyleap and big blast plate
i thinks thats good, no?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/19 09:33:31
Subject: Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
|
It's not Hawks that are bad, it's Baharroth.
|
People are like dice, a certain Frenchman said that. You throw yourself in the direction of your own choosing. People are free because they can do that. Everyone's circumstances are different, but no matter how small the choice, at the very least, you can throw yourself. It's not chance or fate. It's the choice you made. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/19 09:36:00
Subject: Re:Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
can you please say whats good and bad on them, or why and where and on what do you use them?
and Banaroth is bad cause its cost?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/19 10:42:20
Subject: Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Sslimey Sslyth
Busy somewhere, airin' out the skin jobs.
|
A str 3 primary weapon simply doesnt make it at the points you spend for Hawks.
I certainly wish it did...they're my favorite aspect.
Basically, they're nothing in CC. This leaves them as a shooting unit, and while VERY mobile, with a long range assault weapon...the STR of that weapon is just not enough to make them good troops.
They're great in certain situations like armies that are T3, especially if lightly armoured. However, with the amount of T4 out there along with power armour (or cover saves in the case of lightly armoured troopers. Lasblasters just dont make it.
....leaving the units BEST usage as simply rubberhawking the entire game...and at a steep price in points.
|
I have never failed to seize on 4+ in my life!
The best 40k page in the Universe
COMMORRAGH |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/19 12:24:00
Subject: Re:Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
killing vehicles and dropping granade after deepstrike wont justify their cost?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/19 12:54:30
Subject: Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Pestilent Plague Marine with Blight Grenade
|
The grenade pack comes down before deep-striking, that's important.
If they had the assault-after-DS rule (that I just made up I think), they would most likely rock.
"See that cluster of Guard? Yeah they can have this pie-plate."
"See that Vanquisher? Yeah I'm assaulting that now."
So close to being awesome. But the guns stink. They rock at killing vehicles, but the lasblasters are pointless against vehicles. It's a little silly really.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/19 13:30:17
Subject: Re:Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Towering Hierophant Bio-Titan
UK
|
They need to have thier rules amended to counter walkers, aswell as skimmers.
They could do with some form of JSJ ability or improved deep-strikage (less scatter, can move after landing, etc).
Those points aside, their weapons will kill the right units & with the Era of IG with lots of mechenised themes & vehicle squadrens WS4 haywire grenades will rock many flavours of sauce. Oh and monoliths are boned too.
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:Friend of mine just sent me this:
"The Tyranid Codex, where I learned the truth about despair, as will you. There's a reason why this codex is the worst hell on earth... Hope. ." Too be fair.. it's all worked out quite well!
Heh. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/20 03:39:05
Subject: Re:Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Swift Swooping Hawk
|
The biggest problem is that they lost so much in their most recent codex. Haywire grenades now only pen on a 6; and in the old codex the exarch was wild in cc, now the exarch lets them bounce. For what you get they are just overpriced now compared to the other eldar specialist troops.
Sliggoth
|
Why does my eldar army run three fire prisms? Because the rules wont let me use four in (regular 40k). |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/20 04:06:14
Subject: Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Infiltrating Oniwaban
|
Yep, overpriced is the problem, plus conflicting abilities. the new eldar codex did a good job of resolving the many conflicting roles Aspect warriors had (removing power weapons from ranged Aspects, etc.), but seems to have missed it with the Hawks.
If you're really, really into using them, the Sunrifle makes them a bit more useful: the pin check can help vs. the T3 armies that lasblasters actually hurt. The problem, again, is that those T3 armies can also outshoot the Hawks, and their 4+ armor just ain't gonna cut it.
What would make them work? JSJ would have been a nice compensation, but Spiders already have that. DS and assault does indeed seem the best choice, possibly with Hit and Run. Given their fragility, it wouldn't be too uber, either.
|
Infinity: Way, way better than 40K and more affordable to boot!
"If you gather 250 consecutive issues of White Dwarf, and burn them atop a pyre of Citadel spray guns, legend has it Gwar will appear and answer a single rules-related question. " -Ouze |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/20 05:07:54
Subject: Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Sneaky Striking Scorpion
|
If they were priced like other aspects at 16 it would certainly make them usable, despite how they don't excel in any single role.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/20 11:30:10
Subject: Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
|
The new codices have increased the effectiveness of anti-infantry fire, and made it cheaper almost universally. Because of this, non-mechanized infantry simply don't last long on the battlefield.
Since Hawks are jump infantry with current LoS rules it's nearly impossible to prevent your opponent from shooting at them with weaponry that will kill the whole unit.
Add this lack of protection onto a hefty price tag and under-performing weapons and you just get a losing combo.
If, for some reason, you really want to run jump infantry Warp Spiders are better in almost every way (stronger guns, more useful exarch upgrades, can move faster, JSJ, 3+ save) and are only 1 point more per model. Although I do realize that they're not competetive against well-built lists, I run spiders and they are a much stronger and more versatile unit.
|
Why did the berzerker cross the road?
Gwar! wrote:Willydstyle has it correct
Gwar! wrote:Yup you're absolutely right
New to the game and can't win? Read this.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/20 13:04:24
Subject: Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Foolproof Falcon Pilot
Somewhere in the unknown universe.
|
The price is too high to use them.
However, you would buy them just for the models- they can have beautiful paint jobs.
|
Manchu wrote:Agamemnon2 wrote:
Congratulations, that was the stupidest remark the entire wargaming community has managed to produce in a long, long time.
Congratulations, your dismissive and conclusory commentary has provided nothing to this discussion or the wider community on whose behalf you arrogantly presume to speak nor does it engage in any meaningful way the remark it lamely targets. But you did manage to gain experience points toward your next level of internet tough guy. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/20 13:24:33
Subject: Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Pestilent Plague Marine with Blight Grenade
|
I may have got it.
Plastic box of 12 models (2 sprues, 10 regs 2 exarchs)
Think DA boxed set here.
16pts per. (extra for Ex)
Jump infantry, Assault 1 S6 blasters, skyleap (Ex), pie plate (Ex), assault after DS (USR), fleet (USR), haywires glance on 3, pen on 4.
Basically making a faster, more anti-vehicle version on DAs.
Like Assault marines, but with great odds on taking on vehicles.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/20 14:32:27
Subject: Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
|
I use them in my army, and its got a 5-1-2 win lose ratio at the moment, playing in a play to win power gamer gaming group.
They are a pretty cheap unit. 6 of them with Intercept exarch and Hawks Talon coming in at 153 points. The reason alot of people dont like them is that they are a Niche Unit and alot of people can cover that niche with other parts of their Army.
However in my list they work perfectly, they can reliably hold a vehicle in place for a turn, usually being able to immobilise it and take the threatening weapons off. This allows my Wave Serpents and to fly past.
They are a very tempremental unit however. In one game they flew in, took a Lemen Russ (the one upgraded to armour 14) out, then flew onto an objective, blasted away the Squad holding it and leaving it contested, meaning I won.
Another game they took 20+ thunderfire shots to the face and died.
Alot of people seem to expect haywire Grenades to be an instant kill, yet that is not what the were designed to do. They get in and at absolute worst will stop it shooting for a turn, yet realistically they'll atleast destroy a weapon/immobilise it. and thats all they need to do.
|
P.M. me for rational Eldar Advice, both on list construction or Tactics.
Also feel free to query me about rules from the Eldar and Space Marine codices, as well as the General Rule book.
Mech Eldar army of the Craftworld Din Cassian currently at 17-6-7.
The Cat in my Avatar is my Cat. He's called Taz and he's just over ten months old. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/20 15:37:07
Subject: Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Sneaky Striking Scorpion
|
I like that Swooping Hawks are basically airborne snipers. Though their guns could certainly use a boost. Increasing the gun from S3 AP5 to Assault 3 S4 AP4 or by increasing them from Assault 2 to Assault 3 would make them a lot more usable against the infantry they are 'supposed' to be able to kill.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/20 15:55:22
Subject: Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Banelord Titan Princeps of Khorne
|
5 Fire Dragons in a stripped down serpent cost about the same as your unit, Combo, and they can put out alot more hurt on a vehicle, doing alot more than just taking the weapons off. They also are pretty mobile and protected with a serpent.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/20 20:45:17
Subject: Re:Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
you guys are maybe right, i just them to be good  so nice models and nice idea of flying shooting and destroying vehicles, but they just cant do it all that good
but on the other isnt this "versality" what makes them playable? fast, shooty and nades with escape skyleap?
maybe if they would make them a bit better in close combat they would be most versalite unit?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/05/20 20:57:17
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/20 21:41:46
Subject: Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Infiltrating Broodlord
|
If you want a good CC unit, you have banshees/scorpions/warlocks in serpents, jetlocks/jetseers/phoenix lords for that. They're the prettiest models out there but I agree with what most everyone has said. They're just too niche to be effective most of the time, especially when you have fire dragons in there, which will basically always be more effective at killing tanks than haywire grenades. And with the serpent you can give it EMLs or scatter lasers to help out with fire support, giving the dragons more of a chance to survive. I love them and I love barroth, but I have scorpions that infiltrate and banshees in serpents for CC, reapers and walkers for high volume fire, and dragons and even harlequins for tanks.
|
Tired of reading new rulebooks... Just wanting to play. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/21 00:41:57
Subject: Swooping hawks- why they are bad?
|
 |
Infiltrating Oniwaban
|
You know, what really ticks me off about Hawks is that they didn't even get a decent Apoc formation! Unless you're facing a flyer-heavy enemy and have no AA guns at all, their in-flight Intercept blows.
Sigh. I wish I could field these 22 Hawks I have SOMEHOW. Dadnabbit.
|
Infinity: Way, way better than 40K and more affordable to boot!
"If you gather 250 consecutive issues of White Dwarf, and burn them atop a pyre of Citadel spray guns, legend has it Gwar will appear and answer a single rules-related question. " -Ouze |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|