| Poll |
 |
|
|
 |
| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/28 22:19:04
Subject: Please bring back fluff for nutters
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
|
why did they change fluff for nutters and
please bring it back
|
PAINT FOR THE PAINT GOD MODELS FOR THE MODEL THRONE |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/28 22:28:02
Subject: Re:Please bring back fluff for nutters
|
 |
Wrack Sufferer
|
In the GRIM/DARK future of the 41st Millennium, there is no fluff, ONLY WAR!
|
Once upon a time, I told myself it's better to be smart than lucky. Every day, the world proves me wrong a little more. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/28 22:34:23
Subject: Please bring back fluff for nutters
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
|
but i like Fluff
|
PAINT FOR THE PAINT GOD MODELS FOR THE MODEL THRONE |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/28 22:37:15
Subject: Please bring back fluff for nutters
|
 |
Wrack Sufferer
|
orkylooter wrote:but i like Fluff
ONLY WAR!
|
Once upon a time, I told myself it's better to be smart than lucky. Every day, the world proves me wrong a little more. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/28 22:43:51
Subject: Please bring back fluff for nutters
|
 |
Deadshot Weapon Moderati
|
Typeline wrote:orkylooter wrote:but i like Fluff
ONLY WAR!
|
I really should be spending my time more constructively. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/29 00:11:00
Subject: Please bring back fluff for nutters
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
|
I voted for both.
|
People are like dice, a certain Frenchman said that. You throw yourself in the direction of your own choosing. People are free because they can do that. Everyone's circumstances are different, but no matter how small the choice, at the very least, you can throw yourself. It's not chance or fate. It's the choice you made. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/29 01:40:28
Subject: Please bring back fluff for nutters
|
 |
Stormin' Stompa
|
No. It was discussions material, noobflame and spamcakes.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/29 02:04:40
Subject: Please bring back fluff for nutters
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
|
So is the OT forum, but you don't complain about it.
|
People are like dice, a certain Frenchman said that. You throw yourself in the direction of your own choosing. People are free because they can do that. Everyone's circumstances are different, but no matter how small the choice, at the very least, you can throw yourself. It's not chance or fate. It's the choice you made. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/29 05:58:08
Subject: Please bring back fluff for nutters
|
 |
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
orkylooter wrote:but i like Fluff
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/29 07:58:49
Subject: Re:Please bring back fluff for nutters
|
 |
Angry Blood Angel Assault marine
Alvin
|
Whats wrong with talking bout some fluff?
|
Blood Angels Army (WIP)
Sign this petion to end Matt Ward's Reign of Terror once and for all....hopefully!!!
http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/StopMattWard
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/29 08:50:42
Subject: Please bring back fluff for nutters
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
|
One of the Mods explained yesterday that,they(the mods/owners of the site)wanted the fluff section to move away from all of the silly spam threads and wanted Dakka to be "THE PLACE" to come to for fluff and fluff discussions.He also stated that these types of threads(silly fluff threads)could still continue but in the OT section of the site.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/05/29 08:51:24
"I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member."-Groucho Marx
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/29 09:18:15
Subject: Please bring back fluff for nutters
|
 |
Stormin' Stompa
|
Cheese Elemental wrote:So is the OT forum, but you don't complain about it.
 That's because it's the OT Forum. What do you expect?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/29 22:48:34
Subject: Please bring back fluff for nutters
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
|
but it not ot it is fluff it funny fluff but its still fluff
|
PAINT FOR THE PAINT GOD MODELS FOR THE MODEL THRONE |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/30 00:29:53
Subject: Please bring back fluff for nutters
|
 |
Stormin' Stompa
|
There's nothing wrong with the OT thread being an OT thread, but I for one was sick of the spam topics that stuck around the roof of the fluff thread, probably harming the response to genuine queries. I was surprised when I saw it gone, but happy to see the new thread that soon replaced it.
Heh, not that I ever used it much, but maybe now I will.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/30 03:36:07
Subject: Please bring back fluff for nutters
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
The "problem" is that the name of the forum was originally created because the common term for 'background' material in games is "fluff" and there was a snack along time ago that was called 'Fluff N Nutters'.
So Russ (who owned the site at the time) called the forum 'fluff for nutters' as a little nod towards that snack's name.
However, the term 'nutter' has a very different connotation in the UK and so the 'theme' of the forum seems to have been twisted because of this.
The purpose of the forum was always intended to be a place to discuss background information (fluff) by those who love background (nutters).
It wasn't in any way supposed to be a forum ONLY to post wacky crap. So it isn't that the forum is 'changing' but rather that the name is being changed to better reflect the PURPOSE that the forum was always supposed to fulfill.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/05/30 03:39:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/30 21:30:36
Subject: Please bring back fluff for nutters
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
|
ok ok how bout make a new one called fluff for nutters
its slilly background
|
PAINT FOR THE PAINT GOD MODELS FOR THE MODEL THRONE |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|