Switch Theme:

D3, what does that mean ?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime







lord marcus wrote:no. when it states roll a d3, take a dice, roll it, and apply the chart velsharoon posted.
Oddly enough, that chart is the same as halving then rounding up, which has been how you have rolled a D3 since time immemorial.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/06/04 04:06:03


 
Made in gb
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime







ph34r wrote:I play that you actually have to have a 3 sided die if you want to roll a d3.
3 Sided dice are physicality impossible to exist in a polygonal form.
Made in gb
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime







krusty wrote:
ph34r wrote:I play that you actually have to have a 3 sided die if you want to roll a d3.


well, glad your not one of the people i play...

Gwar! wrote:
ph34r wrote:I play that you actually have to have a 3 sided die if you want to roll a d3.
3 Sided dice are physicality impossible to exist in a polyhedral form.


not totally true, but impractical definitely...
ive actually sculpted one with 3 equal sized sides and only 3 sides it can land on...
looks slowed but it gets the job done...
Are they 3 Flat Sides? I highly Doubt it. The Smallest polyhedral (yes I made a mistake with Polygonal, woops) is the Tetrahedron, aka the 4 sided dice. Certainly its possible once you get into curved surfaces and such, but there WAS a reason why the actual D100 never replaced the dual D% dice of yore.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/06/04 04:18:24


 
Made in gb
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime







Randomman wrote:A friend of mine had a D3, all it was basically a D6 with the appropriate numbers appearing twice.
But most people just roll a D6 then divide and round up as described above.
Aye buts that's not a D3, that's a D6 with funny markings
Made in gb
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime







Aye, but as I said, that is not a Regular Polyhedral, and as such is of suspect fairness. A Regular Polyhedral is much easier to construct as a fair dice.
Made in gb
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime







ThunderChild wrote:
Ratbarf said: Three sides wouldn't role very well.


Spin it on it's end like a spinning top!
Oh Dr3idel, Dr3idel, Dr3idel! I made you out of THE SKULLS OF THE FALLEN! BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD! SKULLS FOR THE SKULL THRONE!
Made in gb
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime







Well, I have no idea why people are getting so annoyed about math, back in "The Day", when they only had Polyhedral dice and "Barrel" dice were quite rare, D10's were actually D20's marked 0-9 twice in different colours.
Made in gb
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime







Gavin Thorne wrote:Right there with you Gwar!... I still have my 0-9x2/d20 in my dice bag. The first time I saw 00 on a ten sided die, I did a double take before realizing it was a "tens" die.
Indeed, kids today with their D10's and "Special" D%. 2D20 were good enough back then for 1-100 so why not now!
 
Forum Index » Dakka Discussions
Go to: