Jungle0731 wrote:I apologize if someone has brought this up on the forums before but I am relatively new and was just wondering what others thought. I know the canon points towards the Emperor leaving the Great Crusade and establishing the Council on Terra (or whatever it was called) as the reason for the Horus Heresy but I believe that the problem was that there was no super power opposing the fledgling Imperium. Without a real enemy challenging them, the Crusade seemed to be more of a strategic expansion rather than an all out war. As a result, Horus turned towards the one avenue that presented a serious challenge (yes Chaos was involved but you have to think a warrior's pride was what they preyed upon). So would things have been different if the Primarchs had encountered a significant enemy that required a concerted effort? I picked Tyranids because I don't know of any other race that could actually oppose the Crusade on a serious level at that time. Anyways, would just like to see what everyone thinks.
There were some challenging campaigns, but i think it could be said that Horus fear of beeing forgotten when peace commences could
be stalled with an everlasting threat.
OTOH Horus didn't see the main threat => chaos.
So the emperors fault wasn't to leave the crusade but give horus command of it.
Things would be different if:
-the other primarchs realized that Lorgar is a chaos servant and opposed the traitor.
-Horus wasn't so lame and kept his promise to the emperor.
-Fulgrim wasn't so overconfident. Should have shot the traitor fleet down.
-Magnus did as ordered in nicea, but supported his brothers against the ambush.
-Curze got a therapy.
or in short terms: the primarchs accepted their imperfection even if its hard to realize that if youre so powerful.