| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/02 05:37:46
Subject: Question about plasma Gets Hot! rule
|
 |
Slippery Ultramarine Scout Biker
|
i have an argument with my friends that they say that if my SM with a plasma weapon fail to save the Gets Hots save, the model with the plasma weapon has to remove, so i lost my plasma weapon. i can not read anything about Gets Hot! will destory the weapon, so please tell me, is that ture that if i fail the Gets Hot! save, i have to remove the model with plasma weapon instead pick another one?
|
please forgive my spelling, i am still learning English. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/02 05:45:41
Subject: Question about plasma Gets Hot! rule
|
 |
Blackclad Wayfarer
From England. Living in Shanghai
|
Hi again, this should also be in the "you make the call" section.
Yes if the plasma bearer overheats you lose the plasma gun (actually makes sense with the fluff which is rare for GW). Automatically Appended Next Post: By the way is this you Tony?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/07/02 05:46:14
Looking for games in Shanghai? Send a PM |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/02 05:55:40
Subject: Question about plasma Gets Hot! rule
|
 |
Slippery Ultramarine Scout Biker
|
Uh-ho my bad..... can someone move it to "you make the call"section sorry.
|
please forgive my spelling, i am still learning English. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/02 05:59:01
Subject: Question about plasma Gets Hot! rule
|
 |
Blackclad Wayfarer
From England. Living in Shanghai
|
Tony???
|
Looking for games in Shanghai? Send a PM |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/02 11:24:11
Subject: Question about plasma Gets Hot! rule
|
 |
[DCM]
.. .-.. .-.. ..- -- .. -. .- - ..
|
Moved.
|
2025: Games Played:21/Models Bought:253/Sold:294/Painted:195
2024: Games Played:8/Models Bought:393/Sold:519/Painted: 207
2023: Games Played:0/Models Bought:287/Sold:0/Painted: 203
2020-2022: Games Played:42/Models Bought:1271/Sold:631/Painted:442
2012-19: Games Played:781/Models Bought: 1935/Sold:1108/Painted:704 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/02 12:01:20
Subject: Question about plasma Gets Hot! rule
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Just to bring a sense of normality:
If a Model fails a "Gets Hot!" save, that specific model must take the wound.
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/02 13:40:37
Subject: Question about plasma Gets Hot! rule
|
 |
Slippery Ultramarine Scout Biker
|
Errr... i am not tony sorry.
for me, i feel it does not make sense. if the overheat will destory the weapon, then the model should lose its weapon whenever it roll 1 on hit. if a model has multi-wounds then the weapon can overheat multi-time. so the overheat does not destory the weapon, only the model carry it.
i think the rule for Gets Hot! states that the carrier take the wound is preventing people uses other model to allocated the Gets hot! wound from an independant character.
maybe i am silly, that is what i feel.
|
please forgive my spelling, i am still learning English. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/02 13:41:36
Subject: Question about plasma Gets Hot! rule
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
dpredator666 wrote:i think the rule for Gets Hot! states that the carrier take the wound is preventing people uses other model to allocated the Gets hot! wound from an independant character.
Yes, that is exactly why it is like that.
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/02 13:56:31
Subject: Question about plasma Gets Hot! rule
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
dpredator666 wrote:i have to remove the model with plasma weapon instead pick another one?
Page 31, BRB - Gets Hot! says "For each result of a 1 rolled on it's to hit rolls, the firing model suffers a wound (normal saves apply)". Is this in any way unclear? Unless that firing model can somehow avoid taking the wound through some special rule (such as Inquisitors allocating it on their Acolytes) then that firing miodel will have to take it himself.
As for the fluffy bits: The gun just vaporized it's user so the machine spirit must be very, very angry... Best let it cool down and have a techpriest retrieve it later.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/03 02:43:07
Subject: Question about plasma Gets Hot! rule
|
 |
Slippery Ultramarine Scout Biker
|
well that sucks for my devastator squad, i am planning to equip 2 plasma cannons with them. now i have to think over, because i always roll 1. >_<
why can not other people pick up the weapon like they used to be.
|
please forgive my spelling, i am still learning English. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/03 04:07:17
Subject: Question about plasma Gets Hot! rule
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Would YOU pick up a plasma weapon where the magnetic containment cells have ruptured, cooking the previous guy inside his armour?
Didn't think so.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/03 06:58:35
Subject: Question about plasma Gets Hot! rule
|
 |
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
Don't forget: You CAN take a save vs the wound.
Which is always my logic when explaining why a person would want to pick plasma:
"You get an Armour Save, the Target doesn't."
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/07/03 16:08:13
Subject: Question about plasma Gets Hot! rule
|
 |
Guardsman with Flashlight
|
I thought with the allocating wounds rule it mentions the weapon being rendered unusable in the death of it's previous user hence why you must allocate wounds to standard guys individual characters in the unit and speciality weapons in the unit as you could still loose a big weapon in a normal round of shooting if enough wounds were caused and you failed the save.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|