Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I think 40k moudles should be able to jump or duck close combat attacks. I mean if you were in battle and saw some one swing an ax at you would you just stand their or try to live. I vot for live.
Anyway here is a chart That would be nice.

1. you duck and trip the guy
2-4. you duck
5. you jump and leave combat.
6. you guy jumps into the guy and takes a wound.


please respond.

Question, is this not in fact 5th Edition and not 2nd?

We have a thing where your model tries to not die.

It's called the opponent making a 'to hit' roll.

Also, it's model. It took me a minute to figure out what word you were even mangling.

Of course they should. Be a good boy and go play with your Action-Man toys now.

This thread of pointlessness summons me to do my holy work!

I am Saint Mekboy, the Third Saint of the Church of Turtle Pie. Listen, ye citizens of this most pointless thread, I give ye a choice:
Repent for this idiocy by spending your lives worshipping the great Omnidessert, or face fiery anhialation.

OMG, I found a use for Leaping!

Yeah im with orkestra. Think about just two guys trying to hack each other to bits instead of 2 squads trying to hack each other to bits. It simplifies the process.

Normally I have some understanding poster need to answer a questions ...
....but you've completely missed the point of WS where you roll to hit.

I think we're done here.