Daemon Weapons

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Valkyrie**

1: If a Khorne Lord rolls a double one for his Daemon Weapon's extra attacks, does he lose two wounds or just one?

2: As Abbadon has all four marks of Chaos, does he gain all 4 Daemon Weapon benefits?

**solkan**

1. In that unlikely event, the Khornate lord would suffer two wounds, although the model would still get its invulnerable save against the wounds.
2. No, Abbadon does not have a poisoned, instant death to everything power weapon. Abbadon's weapon just does what it says on page 46 of the codex.

**kirsanth**

2. Abbadon has Mark of Chaos Undivided, iirc. Which is not the same.

**Major Malfunction**

solkan wrote:1. In that unlikely event, the Khornate lord would suffer two wounds, although the model would still get its invulnerable save against the wounds.

This is incorrect. The Codex explicitly states he takes one wound, not one wound for each one rolled. Pg 93, inset box Daemon Weapons, Column One, last sentence.

**Orkeosaurus**

Abbadon has the Mark of Chaos Ascendant, I think.

Regardless, he just uses the rules for the weapon as normal.

**nosferatu1001**

The Mark of Chaos Ascendant is *in fluff* all 4 marks, but is actually not. He only gets the (pretty good!) benefits listed exactly under his rules.

If you note it specifically states it counts as doubling his strength *instead* of adding +1 which indicates he cannot have any mark according to the normal tables rules.

**Hollismason**

That would be hilariously overpowered.

**Regwon**

Because d6+4 S8 attacks that re-roll to wound isnt powerful enough.

**nosferatu1001**

That also strike at Init.

**cKerensky**

As unlikely as it's happened, I've had him nearly off himself in two rounds of combat.