Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I managed to catch this last night at a preview screening at my local cinema. This film is historically nonsensical, vulgar, gratuitous, obscenely violent, glorifys war atrocities and is utterly over the top in every way imaginable.

And I'm proud to say I loved every single bloody soaked second. Unless you are the sort of person who insists on historical accuracy in their war movies I cannot recommended this enough. 9/10!

One of the early reviews I read about it described it as follows: "the whole thing is a bizarrely touching exercise in vicarious wish-fulfillment, in which a Gentile filmmaker fashions an alternate history that allows the Jews to kick Hitler’s ass—literally, not metaphorically."

Did it seem that way to you as well?

That seems fairly accurate.

WTF are you talknig about?

Eh, I'm trying to like it but I can't. It's just too stupid.

Emperors Faithful wrote:WTF are you talknig about?

Quentin Tarantino's newest movie.


Haven't seen much of it,only half a trailer so I am rather undecided on wether to watch it or not.

After I saw the trailer for it many moons ago I was nearly sick at how bad it looked. I haven't liked a siingle Tarantino movie to date and seeing as this one seems to just want to be insulting and bloody for the sake of being insulting and bloody I refuse to even entertain the idea of seeing it.

Sounds OK. I like a bit of gratuitous violence myself, but I have a feeling that Hollywood's going to be out of fake blood for months.

The accents are horrible and while yes it is a homage to the cheesy war movies of the 60's this is just.. UGH.

WHY is that kid from the office in it??

I was so excited by the first 10 seconds of the commercial, and then his face popped up and ruined it. He can't act in the office let alone in a WW2 setting. Even in a small a sample as a 1 second clip in a commercial he felt out of place. He has to be buddies with the director or something, sort of like a "hey buddy hook me up" deal.

So I refuse to see it. Which is a shame because the rest looked funny, if not historically accurate at all

were gonna kill some nahzi's

"FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP fap fap..."

STOP THAT QUENTIN... man, what the hell.

I cannot honestly say that this movie looks good. Another zombie flick would have been a whole lot better, regardless of how good this flick turns out to be.

On the TV adverts they just call it 'Inglorious'. Is this a worthy follow on to the tradition of 'Kelly's Heroes' or just kosher porn? Maybe I'll go find out.

Its pronounced natzi.

And each one of them is responsible for brining back 100 natzi scalps.

There was another movie of the about same title.

Inglorious Basterds with an "a" instead of an "e".

halonachos wrote:Its pronounced natzi.

And each one of them is responsible for brining back 100 natzi scalps.

There was another movie of the about same title.

Inglorious Basterds with an "a" instead of an "e".

They changed it so they could make posters. Apparently just changing the one letter made it ok.

Our bidness is keeling gnatzies, and brother our bidness is booming.

Funny, Brits say it as 'Narrhht-zee'.

We got it wrong for once. I defy you to find a German saying Nartzee.

sA

He can't even say Natzi, he says Narr-zi. - Franz Liebkind

Seeing as though I don't want to risk which naughty language I should put up, here's the link to the video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cGaYDwpXf4

infilTRAITOR wrote:this one seems to just want to be insulting and bloody for the sake of being insulting and bloody

I think pretty much all of Tarantino's movies could be described in this fashion. I liked Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown. Not a huge fan of anything else of his. I probably won't see it, just because I haven't made it to a movie in about 6 months, unless it was Rated G and I had one or more kids in tow.