| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/17 10:21:07
Subject: Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
ROK
|
Does anyone else think that tank shocking is a good idea in objective games? I mean it moves a scoring unit away from the score point and moves a contesting unit in. Plus if the tank is carrying a unit they can score. I play Eldar and turbo boosting a tank into a scoring unit has had some good results. Today I had a scoring unit fail and run off the board while another unit simply moved out of the way. I was wondering if anyone else thinks this is a good early to midgame tactic and as a last ditch effort?
|
Nothing currently, got out of the hobby, maybe getting back in? |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/17 10:25:14
Subject: Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Missionary On A Mission
The Eye of Terror
|
As a last-ditch effort it works very well, but that's it. The problem with tank shocking is death or glory attacks. Your land raider is too expensive to risk it against a melta-wielding guardsman, except in the last turn, and your rhino is too fragile to expect it to succeed against that same guardsman, but in the last turn, why not?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/17 10:27:22
Subject: Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
It's a great tactic all the time. Unless they have powerfists or melta weapons.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/08/17 10:28:03
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/17 10:32:24
Subject: Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Numberless Necron Warrior
|
I use Rhinos that don't have their payload to push the Enemy around like that. Used it on Tyrinids a Month ago in order to push them off of a objective point in order to squeeze out a win. Just a few weeks ago I used an empty Rhino to stop some Chaos Marines from pushing me off of an Objective point. Really, when the Rhino is empty I turn them into Bulldozers. They aren't high Priority Targets, but they do come in handy when you need em.
So, yes. I use Tankshock a lot.
|
Life Sucks Press On.
In order of collection:
Space Marines
Necrons
Renegade Guardsmen
Dark Eldar |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/17 10:37:11
Subject: Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
ROK
|
Well, it was a eldar vs eldar game today and I shocked a group of scoring guardians off 2nd turn. The ws got wrecked and the banshees were assaulted by his banshees and died (bad rolls). Then they were killed by ws. Fun game though. But I ts the guardians off and moved another squad into firing range of rangers. Personally I think tankshocking is an underestimated tactic. As for death and glory, not many units have the equipment to do it.
|
Nothing currently, got out of the hobby, maybe getting back in? |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/17 14:22:56
Subject: Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Rough Rider with Boomstick
|
The Bloody Handed God wrote:Well, it was a eldar vs eldar game today and I shocked a group of scoring guardians off 2nd turn. The ws got wrecked and the banshees were assaulted by his banshees and died (bad rolls). Then they were killed by ws. Fun game though. But I ts the guardians off and moved another squad into firing range of rangers. Personally I think tankshocking is an underestimated tactic. As for death and glory, not many units have the equipment to do it.
That is absolutely correct...and even then you have only a 50% chance of halting the vehicle IF the vehicle is penetrated...
|
40K 5th ed W/L/D
65/4/6, 10/2/1, 10/3/0, 2/0/1, 0/1/1
40K 6th ed W/L/D
1/0/0
WHFB 8th ed WHFB
Empire: 12/3/2, Lizardmen: 16/3/2 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/17 14:47:09
Subject: Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Banelord Titan Princeps of Khorne
|
Don't forget that they may only attempt death or glory if they are directly in the tanks path. So if you tank shock the edge of the unit and the melta/powerfist is not in the path of the tank, they cannot attempt a DoG.
Also remember that tank shocks can be used to bunch units up for templates.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/17 14:50:46
Subject: Re:Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Lady of the Lake
|
Use it to sweep low Ld enemies off the board. Use either two or three empty transports, each taking a turn trying to make them fall back. When they start falling back, the other transports can go back to doing whatever and one should stay within 6" of the enemy you just made fall back.
When all the weapons got destroyed on my Vindicator that's all it could do. A fex ate it, but it still tried. Another time, it ran over a bunch of Eldar.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/17 15:07:57
Subject: Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Sinister Chaos Marine
|
The Bloody Handed God wrote:Personally I think tankshocking is an underestimated tactic.
Seconded! I'm always wondering why tankshock is so seldomly mentioned in the 40K tactics section of Dakka.
|
Space_Potato wrote:Just Dave wrote:Simple Question Really, how do you think things would be different if Guilliman hadn't created the Codex Astartes?
Rape and pillage! Orks roaming the countryside, raping our churches and burning our women! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/17 15:22:39
Subject: Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Also people forget a lot of the times that CC attacks are resolved on the FRONT armor so power fists are not that dangerous
I tank shock all the time with empty transports
|
Keeper of the DomBox
Warhammer Armies - Click to see galleries of fully painted armies
32,000, 19,000, Renegades - 10,000 , 7,500, |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/17 15:27:55
Subject: Re:Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Lady of the Lake
|
In 5th CC is resolved on the back armour. Powerfists usually mean 2 to glance 3 to penetrate.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/17 15:31:36
Subject: Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Foolproof Falcon Pilot
|
I tank shock constantly with my Mech Eldar. It is highly effective at clearing objectives in the late game and for moving shooty units out of position to shoot at the rest of your army. Also, it is a great way to buch up enemy units for triple flamer template doom. All in al, TS is a very valubale tool in any Mech Eldar list.
Also, it is very, very tough to have an effective DoG vs. a WS or any Eldar tank with a Holofield.
@not-u: You are mistaken. DoG rules state that all DoG attacks are reolved against front armor.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/08/17 15:32:38
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/17 15:36:39
Subject: Re:Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Lady of the Lake
|
lol yeah tired, I thought it was normal CC for a second for some reason.
I agree they really aren't that frightening in DoG, in normal CC they are. So I guess it could be an alright tactic for dealing with any fists that get too close.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/17 15:55:35
Subject: Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I think tank shocks are great for objective grabbing... especially when you have a Battlewagon full of Nobz with a Deff Rolla on it.
D6 S10 hits, LD test, then you can try that DoG and oh... another D6 S10 hits. If you get through front armor 14 and can stop me I'm going to pile out and hit you with the Nobz. If not... well I'm going to pile out and hit you with the Nobz unless its turn 6.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/08/17 15:56:05
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/17 16:14:26
Subject: Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Long-Range Ultramarine Land Speeder Pilot
Dallas, TX
|
Even against a 'Fist or 'Claw, the chances that they will loose that expensive piece of kit and model is very high.
|
Ultramarines Second Company - ~4000 points
Dark Eldar WIP - ~800 points
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/17 20:20:45
Subject: Re:Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Ultramarine Scout with Sniper Rifle
Berkley, MI
|
n0t_u wrote:In 5th CC is resolved on the back armour. Powerfists usually mean 2 to glance 3 to penetrate.
Tank Shock and Death or Glory attacks are not CC. They strike Front Armor. Page 69 of the rulebook.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/17 23:25:01
Subject: Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
|
Battlewagons are the best tank for Tank Shocking/Ramming. All those S10 attacks are going to pulverise anything. You haven't lived until you've seen Abbadon squashed flat.
|
People are like dice, a certain Frenchman said that. You throw yourself in the direction of your own choosing. People are free because they can do that. Everyone's circumstances are different, but no matter how small the choice, at the very least, you can throw yourself. It's not chance or fate. It's the choice you made. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/18 03:41:07
Subject: Re:Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
n0t_u wrote:In 5th CC is resolved on the back armour. Powerfists usually mean 2 to glance 3 to penetrate.
Proves my point about DoG being misunderstood :p
|
Keeper of the DomBox
Warhammer Armies - Click to see galleries of fully painted armies
32,000, 19,000, Renegades - 10,000 , 7,500, |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/18 10:08:12
Subject: Re:Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Lady of the Lake
|
Kirasu wrote:n0t_u wrote:In 5th CC is resolved on the back armour. Powerfists usually mean 2 to glance 3 to penetrate.
Proves my point about DoG being misunderstood :p
Read my post after that
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/18 14:25:51
Subject: Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I did read it.. but thats the kind of kneejerk response in games that I see.. and gets power fists killed heh
|
Keeper of the DomBox
Warhammer Armies - Click to see galleries of fully painted armies
32,000, 19,000, Renegades - 10,000 , 7,500, |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/18 21:54:06
Subject: Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
With Eldar holo fields go a long way for falcons. I've also started taking vectored engines or on my falcon.
I run 5 dires + eldrad (or a standard farseer) in it. With fortune it's super resilient. Had tons of success with the unit thus far.
Another good thing to note is against things like canifex. They usually don;t have a chance to kill you and if they don't they become windshield slim. IF they choose to move off they are pushed off the objective.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/08/18 22:21:28
Subject: Tankshock as a viables tactic in objective.
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Yay tank shocking just got better.
Didnt know that little fact about the guy going for DoG had to be in the way of the vehicle.
Now i really need to buy Rhinos. Gone are the days of my pure footslogger army.....
|
3000 points.
5000 points and still growing when GW adds something cool.
3500 points centered around 25 Terminators and 12 Dreadnoughts
500 points and just started.
5 Warlords / 5 Reavers / 4 Warhounds of the Legio Pallidus Mor. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|