Switch Theme:

Drop Pod Rules Question  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in au
Malicious Mandrake





Under the inertial guidance system rules in the Space Marine Codex it states the following: "Should the drop pod scatter on top of impassable terrain or another model (friend or foe!) then reduce the scatter distance by the minimum required in order to avoid the obstacle." My question is, what if the drop pod scatters off the board edge? What is the board edge classed as? Do you reduce the distance, roll on the mishap table, or is the pod and its contents removed? Please answer, or the need to know may drive me insane!

*Click*  
   
Made in us
Repentia Mistress





The board edge is impassible terrain.
   
Made in us
Annoyed Blood Angel Devastator




Alaska

I believe it suffers a mishap, since under Deep Strike Mishaps it states "land off the table.". I may be wrong, but I don't think off the table counts as impassable since the world ends at the table edge.

Current Army: Too many freaking Jump Packs 1500
Gwar! wrote:The newb has it right.
 
   
Made in us
Martial Arts Fiday






Nashville, TN

Mishap.

The board edge is impassible terrain.


Nope.

"Holy Sh*&, you've opened my eyes and changed my mind about this topic, thanks Dakka OT!"

-Nobody Ever

Proverbs 18:2

"CHEESE!" is the battlecry of the ill-prepared.

 warboss wrote:

GW didn't mean to hit your wallet and I know they love you, baby. I'm sure they won't do it again so it's ok to purchase and make up.


Albatross wrote:I think SlaveToDorkness just became my new hero.

EmilCrane wrote:Finecast is the new Matt Ward.

Don't mess with the Blade and Bolter! 
   
Made in us
Perfect Shot Dark Angels Predator Pilot





Oregon

The board edge counting as impassable terrain was a 4th ed rule, but in 5th they deleted that sentence from the BRB.
   
Made in au
Malicious Mandrake





Ok, thanks for the responses. So I was right all along...

*Click*  
   
Made in au
Tail Gunner






great, the board edge doesnt count as impassable terrain, but how does the drop pod miss the battlefield? the internal guidence system rule was designed to prevent it from having to go through the messy issues of deepstrike mishap.

Only of life was more linear, then it would be more straight forward

1000-2000 pts
1500pts 
   
Made in gb
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime







warhammersupernerd wrote:great, the board edge doesnt count as impassable terrain, but how does the drop pod miss the battlefield? the internal guidence system rule was designed to prevent it from having to go through the messy issues of deepstrike mishap.
No, it wasn't. It was made to avoid the messy issues of Landing in Impassible terrain. Board edge != Impassible terrain, so it mishaps.

How is it a messy situation? If it gets Delayed it just goes back into reserves and comes on as normal.

Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!)
 
   
Made in au
Tail Gunner






but the drop pod "Internal guidence system" states:

"Should the drop pod scatter on top of impassable terrain or another model (friend or foe!) then reduce the scatter distance by the mininum required to avoid the obstacle"

Doesn't that mean that you have to reduce the scatter so you DON'T land on impassable terrain, thus not having to do anything about the deepstrike mishap table?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/09/12 14:47:09


Only of life was more linear, then it would be more straight forward

1000-2000 pts
1500pts 
   
Made in us
Furious Raptor





Doesn't that mean that you have to reduce the scatter so you DON'T land on impassable terrain, thus not having to do anything about the deepstrike mishap table?


That's exactly what that means... when you're landing on impassible terrain.

But the board edge isn't impassible terrain so the inertial guidance system rule doesn't apply.

-GK


Willydstyle wrote:Giantkiller, while those were very concise and logical rebuttals to the tenets upon which he based his argument... he made a post which was essentially a gentlemanly "bow out" from the debate, which should be respected.

GiantKiller: beating dead horses since 2006. 
   
Made in au
Tail Gunner






arrrrrgh. can som1 give me a more sound definition to the bored edge OTHER then the end of the world? (thats the RAW)

Only of life was more linear, then it would be more straight forward

1000-2000 pts
1500pts 
   
Made in us
Lethal Lhamean






Venice, Florida

Under deep strike mishaps (pg. 95 of the rulebook) it states that you'll experience a mishap when your unit would;

"land off the table, in impassable terrain, on top of a friendly model, or within 1" of an enemy model"

Therefore the definition of landing off the table puts your unit "off the table" *not* in impassable terrain, which is something different. That's why the drop pod ability wouldn't come into effect.

Thor665's Dark Eldar Tactica - A comprehensive guide to all things DE (Totally finished...till I update bits and pieces!)
Thor665's battle reports DE vs. assorted armies.
Splintermind: The Dark Eldar Podcast It's a podcast, about Dark Eldar.
Dashofpepper wrote:Thor665 is actually a Dark Eldar god, manifested into electronic bytes and presented here on dakkadakka to bring pain and destruction to all lesser races. Read his tactica, read his forums posts, and when he deigns to critique or advise you directly, bookmark it and pay attention.
 
   
Made in au
Tail Gunner






hmmm.. well that makes sense now that i see that quote.. and much to my anoyance too. Damn the adaptus mechanicus, why cant they invent a guidence system that works! May the emperor damn them for eternity!

Only of life was more linear, then it would be more straight forward

1000-2000 pts
1500pts 
   
Made in au
Malicious Mandrake





So, Warhammersupernerd, I was right all along. Shame it took about 12 veteran gamers to convince you.

*Click*  
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: