| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/30 16:08:11
Subject: This weeks game 9-29-09
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Another fun evening 2 on 2 , 2k pts a side.
CSM / ORK v TAU / NECRON
Pitched Battle, Seize Ground 5 Objectives
Ended Turn 6 with a CSM / ORK victory 1 - 0
Yeah seems like a battle report but had alot of interesting things come up.
1)Firewarriors assaulted and surrounded my tank not to damage it but to surround all the access points being 'Ard Case Battlewagon. Inside the battlewagon was Thrak and 3 meganobz. Didn't run into this due to amazingly bad vehicle destruction table rolls, but if it was wrecked there was no room to disembark units inside destroyed?
2)Multi Level Assault - 3 Necron Destroyers were on a level 3" up my orks were 2 " away so 5" total with a Terrain test(we didnt look to see if a ladder counted as terrain test for movement) Was a 6 on a roll and was able to get a few orks in base to base as the others rolled in. In that shooting phase 2 of the 3 went down but didnt run away. During the assault can you stand on their bodies? The room on that second level was pretty small with all 3 up (could only fit 5 orks) would of been more if we could of stood on the possible WBB corpses. So re cap (2a) Climbing ladders a Terrain Test? (2b) WBB bodies block movement? During assault since they are their but not? (2c) You like Tacos?
3) Boarding Plank- It seems to read like Death or Glory without the death part. If used on a skimmer tank is a roll to hit still required of a 6? We laughed but I had to use a boarding platform on the front of the truck to reach so next question is there a side designated for planks?
4) Wraith Scarabs (i believe) when moving flat out have it written in their codex as a 3+ invlun save for moving ludicris speed but thats old edition rules its just 3+ cover with 5th Ed right?
5) C'tan blades from the Necron Army / Wargear that say ignore all saves includes invuln saves? In their codex it says yes dunno if this still holds true.
6) How is your week going?
Thanks for your time and opinions
-Cheers
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/09/30 16:13:06
"Definition: 'Love' is making a shot to the knees of a target 120 kilometers away using an Aratech sniper rifle with a tri-light scope. Statement: This definition, I am told, is subject to interpretation. Obviously, love is a matter of odds. Not many meatbags could make such a shot, and fewer would derive love from it. Yet for me, love is knowing your target, putting them in your targeting reticle, and together, achieving a singular purpose, against statistically long odds." ~ HK-47 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/30 16:19:41
Subject: This weeks game 9-29-09
|
 |
Wolf Guard Bodyguard in Terminator Armor
|
1. If the vehicles access points were blocked he could emergency disembark anywhere 2" form the hull, if the vehicle was completely surrounded then yes, they are destroyed.
2. no idea at all
3. boarding plank attacks hit the rear armor, just like normal close-combat attacks (afaik)
4. if it is written in the codex as an invul save, its an invul save, if it just says you recieve the normal save bonus for moving flat out then it would be the cover save.
5. still true
6 decent, overtime at work to pay the government so they can pay the big companies, who in turn take money from me.
|
THE HORUS HERESY: Emprah: Hours, go reconquer the galaxy so there can be a new golden age. Horus: But I should be Emprah, bawwwwww! Emprah: Magnus, stop it with the sorcery. Magnus: But I know what's best, bawwwwww! Emprah: Horus, tell Russ to bring Magnus to me because I said so. Horus: Emprah wants you to kill Magnus because he said so. Russ: Fine. Emprah's always right. Plus Ole Red has already been denounced as a traitor and I never liked him anyway. Russ: You're about to die, cyclops! Magnus: O noes! Tzeentch, I choose you! Bawwwww! Russ: Ah well. Now to go kill Horus. Russ: Rowboat, how have you not been doing anything? Guilliman: . . . I've been writing a book. Russ: Sigh. Let's go. Guilliman: And I fought the Word Bearers! Horus: Oh shi--Spess Puppies a'comin? Abbadon: And the Ultramarines, sir. Horus: Who? Anyway, this looks bad. *enter Sanguinis* What are you doing here? Come to join me? Sanguinius: *throws self on Horus's power claws* Alas, I am undone! When you play Castlevania, remember me! *enter Emprah* Emprah: Horus! So my favorite son killed my favorite daughter! Horus: What about the Lion? Emprah: Never liked her. Horus: No one does. Now prepare to die! *mortally wounds Emprah*Emprah: Au contraire, you dick. *kills Horus* Dorn: Okay, now I just plug this into this and . . . okay, it works! Emprah? Hellooooo? Jonson: I did nothing! Guilliman: I did more nothing that you! Jonson: Nuh-uh. I was the most worthless! Guilliman: Have you read my book? Dorn: No one likes that book. Khan: C'mon guys. It's not that bad. Dorn: I guess not. Russ: You all suck. Ima go bring the Emprah back to life.
DA:80-S+++G+++M++++B++I+Pw40k97#+D++++A++++/fWD199R+++T(S)DM+ |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/30 16:48:55
Subject: This weeks game 9-29-09
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Demogerg wrote:1. If the vehicles access points were blocked he could emergency disembark anywhere 2" form the hull, if the vehicle was completely surrounded then yes, they are destroyed. 3. boarding plank attacks hit the rear armor, just like normal close-combat attacks (afaik) 4. if it is written in the codex as an invul save, its an invul save, if it just says you recieve the normal save bonus for moving flat out then it would be the cover save. 5. still true
This is all correct, apart from the silly colonial spellings 3. You ignore Downed necrons completely. You can "stand on them" just fine, and when they get up, they are placed into a legal position. 6) Meh, not good, not terrible. Tried to release a Spess Puppeh FAQ, got trolled to bits
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/09/30 16:49:54
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/30 16:53:41
Subject: Re:This weeks game 9-29-09
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
:( Sorry to hear Gwar.
Thank you and Demogerg for the time and input. Tune in next week as our hapless group discovers more fun situations.
|
"Definition: 'Love' is making a shot to the knees of a target 120 kilometers away using an Aratech sniper rifle with a tri-light scope. Statement: This definition, I am told, is subject to interpretation. Obviously, love is a matter of odds. Not many meatbags could make such a shot, and fewer would derive love from it. Yet for me, love is knowing your target, putting them in your targeting reticle, and together, achieving a singular purpose, against statistically long odds." ~ HK-47 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/30 17:25:46
Subject: This weeks game 9-29-09
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
You "hit" normally using the boarding planks, so if the skimmer has moved over 6" then it would need a 6 to hit.
Remember that thsi is a change from 4th: skimmers use the normal "to hit" now, they dont have an auto "6's only" as they did in 4th.
6) not bad, waiting to hear back on 2 job interviews - unemployment for first tiem since uni sucks.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/30 17:26:17
Subject: This weeks game 9-29-09
|
 |
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
Frenzied Potato wrote:
2)Multi Level Assault - 3 Necron Destroyers were on a level 3" up my orks were 2 " away so 5" total with a Terrain test(we didnt look to see if a ladder counted as terrain test for movement) Was a 6 on a roll and was able to get a few orks in base to base as the others rolled in. In that shooting phase 2 of the 3 went down but didnt run away. During the assault can you stand on their bodies? The room on that second level was pretty small with all 3 up (could only fit 5 orks) would of been more if we could of stood on the possible WBB corpses. So re cap (2a) Climbing ladders a Terrain Test? (2b) WBB bodies block movement? During assault since they are their but not? (2c) You like Tacos?
2a: This is up to the players to determine while placing terrain. If not specified, it's probably most fair to count ladders as DT. 2b: Necron models awaiting WBB are ignored for all normal game purposes; When I played Necrons I would usually just move them out of the way when necessary. 2c: Tacos are awesome.
4) Wraith Scarabs (i believe) when moving flat out have it written in their codex as a 3+ invlun save for moving ludicris speed but thats old edition rules its just 3+ cover with 5th Ed right?
In 5th it is a coversave. Note that Wraiths and Scarabs are different units, and that Scarabs get +1 to their cover saves due to the Small Targets rules in the codex. Yes, this means that Scarabs get a 2+ coversave when turbo boosting (and yes they can TB).
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/30 17:38:53
Subject: This weeks game 9-29-09
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
nosferatu1001 wrote:You "hit" normally using the boarding planks, so if the skimmer has moved over 6" then it would need a 6 to hit.
Remember that thsi is a change from 4th: skimmers use the normal "to hit" now, they dont have an auto "6's only" as they did in 4th.
6) not bad, waiting to hear back on 2 job interviews - unemployment for first tiem since uni sucks.
I know the process all too well best of luck on your results. Thanks for the hand  My tau buddy will like the result.
Lordhat wrote:Frenzied Potato wrote:
2)Multi Level Assault - 3 Necron Destroyers were on a level 3" up my orks were 2 " away so 5" total with a Terrain test(we didnt look to see if a ladder counted as terrain test for movement) Was a 6 on a roll and was able to get a few orks in base to base as the others rolled in. In that shooting phase 2 of the 3 went down but didnt run away. During the assault can you stand on their bodies? The room on that second level was pretty small with all 3 up (could only fit 5 orks) would of been more if we could of stood on the possible WBB corpses. So re cap (2a) Climbing ladders a Terrain Test? (2b) WBB bodies block movement? During assault since they are their but not? (2c) You like Tacos?
2a: This is up to the players to determine while placing terrain. If not specified, it's probably most fair to count ladders as DT. 2b: Necron models awaiting WBB are ignored for all normal game purposes; When I played Necrons I would usually just move them out of the way when necessary. 2c: Tacos are awesome.
4) Wraith Scarabs (i believe) when moving flat out have it written in their codex as a 3+ invlun save for moving ludicris speed but thats old edition rules its just 3+ cover with 5th Ed right?
In 5th it is a coversave. Note that Wraiths and Scarabs are different units, and that Scarabs get +1 to their cover saves due to the Small Targets rules in the codex. Yes, this means that Scarabs get a 2+ coversave when turbo boosting (and yes they can TB).
Ah again thank you all for your time and continous input. Very great help, love this community.
|
"Definition: 'Love' is making a shot to the knees of a target 120 kilometers away using an Aratech sniper rifle with a tri-light scope. Statement: This definition, I am told, is subject to interpretation. Obviously, love is a matter of odds. Not many meatbags could make such a shot, and fewer would derive love from it. Yet for me, love is knowing your target, putting them in your targeting reticle, and together, achieving a singular purpose, against statistically long odds." ~ HK-47 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/30 19:16:09
Subject: This weeks game 9-29-09
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Frenzied - cheers for the thoughts
It makes monoliths slightly easier to take down now - at worst a 4+ to hit in CC in stead of the 6+ they used to get
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/01 01:21:21
Subject: Re:This weeks game 9-29-09
|
 |
Furious Raptor
|
nosferatu1001 wrote:You "hit" normally using the boarding planks, so if the skimmer has moved over 6" then it would need a 6 to hit.
Remember that this is a change from 4th: skimmers use the normal "to hit" now, they dont have an auto "6's only" as they did in 4th.
This.
As far as "is there a side [of the trukk] designated for planks" the rule doesn't specify:
"A boarding plank allows a single embarked Ork to make its close combat attacks against an enemy vehicle within 2" ... " Codex: Orks p. 93
This could mean within 2" of the plank or within 2" of the vehicle equipped with the plank. Following WYSIWYG principles, I'd probably interpret it as 2" from the side of the trukk the plank is modeled on. But I'm certainly open to argument on that one.
- GK
|
Willydstyle wrote:Giantkiller, while those were very concise and logical rebuttals to the tenets upon which he based his argument... he made a post which was essentially a gentlemanly "bow out" from the debate, which should be respected.
GiantKiller: beating dead horses since 2006. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|