Switch Theme:

Determing AV Facings?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran





Arlington, VA

How do you physically determine what AV you're shooting into? The diagram in the BRB seems pretty clear that you divide the target corner-to-corner and that determines front vs side vs rear. However, I was recently told that the correct way is to use 90 degree arcs from the center of the tank (basically assuming the tank is a perfect square). This seems a little iffy, as it doesn't match the diagram in the book and would give a major advantage to tanks like Chimeras with longer sides. I'm used to doing the corner-to-corner measurment, but if I've been doing it wrong I'd like to know.

Check out my blog for bat reps and pics of my Ultramarine Honorguard (Counts as GK) Army!
Howlingmoon wrote:Good on you for finally realizing the scum that is tournament players, Warhammer would really be better off if those mongrels all left to play Warmachine with the rest of the anti-social miscreants.
combatmedic wrote:Im sure the only reason Japan lost WW2 was because the US failed disclose beforehand they had Tactical Nuke special rule.

 
   
Made in us
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps






the correct way is corner to corner. when in doubt, follow the rulebook.
   
Made in gb
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime







Correct way is to use common sense it would seem.

The "Corner to Corner" method breaks down for Eldar Tanks

Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!)
 
   
Made in us
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine





True,
Because having side armor 12 and front armor 12 on Eldar tanks is too confusing.

Visit http://www.ironfistleague.com for games, tournaments and more in the DC metro area! 
   
Made in us
Infiltrating Hawwa'





Australia

paidinfull wrote:True,
Because having side armor 12 and front armor 12 on Eldar tanks is too confusing.


Tau. Enough said.

DakkaDakka.com does not allow users to delete their accounts or content. We don't apologize for this.  
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Omadon's Realm

Tau tank footprint is basically a rectangle, front, sides and back.



 
   
Made in us
Infiltrating Hawwa'





Australia

MeanGreenStompa wrote:Tau tank footprint is basically a rectangle, front, sides and back.


True, but it is more complex than Imperial tanks...

DakkaDakka.com does not allow users to delete their accounts or content. We don't apologize for this.  
   
Made in us
Raging-on-the-Inside Blood Angel Sergeant




Ohio

Yes but you can split it into 4 regions with 2 pieces of paper. It's ususally obvious unless you are directly on a corner - which is a problem all the time anyways.

5000+ Points
3000+ Points
3500+ Points
2000+ Points
Cleveland Penny Pincher 
   
Made in us
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran





Arlington, VA

Gwar! wrote:Correct way is to use common sense it would seem.

The "Corner to Corner" method breaks down for Eldar Tanks


So what's this common sense you speak of?

I think I'm going to stick with corner-to-corner (of the footprint) as I can't find any justisification of the 90 degree arcs.

Check out my blog for bat reps and pics of my Ultramarine Honorguard (Counts as GK) Army!
Howlingmoon wrote:Good on you for finally realizing the scum that is tournament players, Warhammer would really be better off if those mongrels all left to play Warmachine with the rest of the anti-social miscreants.
combatmedic wrote:Im sure the only reason Japan lost WW2 was because the US failed disclose beforehand they had Tactical Nuke special rule.

 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Burtucky, Michigan

That would be the smart wya.
OR
Do what I do. Just assault the basterds. Front sides.... friggin antenna I dont care. They all go to the rear lol
   
Made in us
Ship's Officer





Reading, UK

Gornall wrote:This seems a little iffy, as it doesn't match the diagram in the book and would give a major advantage to tanks like Chimeras with longer sides.
Nitpick

Chimeras are 12/10/10 so, since being longer reduces your front arc as well as your rear arc, it would actually gives them a disadvantage since you will more likely hit AV10 rather than the front AV12.

/Nitpick

DoW

"War. War never changes." - Fallout

4000pts
3000pts
1000pts
2500pts 
   
Made in se
Stealthy Space Wolves Scout





DogOfWar wrote:
Gornall wrote:This seems a little iffy, as it doesn't match the diagram in the book and would give a major advantage to tanks like Chimeras with longer sides.
Nitpick

Chimeras are 12/10/10 so, since being longer reduces your front arc as well as your rear arc, it would actually gives them a disadvantage since you will more likely hit AV10 rather than the front AV12.

/Nitpick

DoW

That's what he said. 90 degree arcs would be an advantage to Chimeras.
Personally I prefer the method of making an as small as possible imaginary rectangle that fit the whole hull of the vehicle and then use the corner to corner method on that.

In one game turn an Imperial guardsman can move 6", kill a few guys with his flamer, assault 6", kill two more guys with his bayonet, flee 12", regroup when assaulted, react 6", kill one more guy with his bayonet and then flee another 12".
So in one game turn an Imperial guardsman can move 42" and kill more than 5 people. At the same time a Chimera at top speed on a road can move 18"... 
   
Made in us
Impassive Inquisitorial Interrogator





Florida, USA

If you think about it, all tanks have larger side armor regions then front or back, that just makes sense since vehicles are long. From range, it's fairly simple to only expose frong armor, the problem really only comes into play when you get closer.

But yes, I always go corner to corner and then use the X, that's the way the rulebook does it. Had a guy at the LGS that used to say, 'I can see the side so I hit side' Haha, not the right way. But yeah, use the X and you should be fine. And nice diagram above by the way.

You don't see da eyes of da Daemon, till him come callin'
- King Willy - Predator 2 
   
Made in au
Frightening Flamer of Tzeentch







I use a folded up 10 inch paper circle to work out angles. It works a treat. It's also a good substitute for when the 10inch blast is too far away.

When you call an intimate moment with your partner "the Assault Phase"

Is that followed by a pile-in move?

That brings a whole new meaning to the term "Hit and Run"

Can that be following a deep strike, or do you have to wait until the next round? 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: