| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2009/10/10 14:44:38
Subject: Conceal for vehicles?
|
|
Courageous Skink Brave
|
He guys, i dont know if it is asked before, but do vehicles also get a 5+ cover save if a warlock with conceal is embarked within it?
|
|
|
 |
|
2009/10/10 14:53:07
Subject: Conceal for vehicles?
|
|
Proud Phantom Titan
|
Pimmilicious wrote:He guys, i dont know if it is asked before, but do vehicles also get a 5+ cover save if a warlock with conceal is embarked within it?
No as warlocks can never be part of a unit of vehicles ... excluding artillery in which case 5+cover save for all also this should be in YMDC
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/10/10 14:53:39
|
|
|
|
|
2009/10/10 15:14:05
Subject: Conceal for vehicles?
|
|
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer
Somewhere in south-central England.
|
Moving to YMDC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009/10/10 15:37:50
Subject: Conceal for vehicles?
|
|
Junior Officer with Laspistol
|
Tri has it right. Despite the ambiguous wording of "the unit he is with" (or something like that) within the larger context of the rules this must mean "the unit that the warlock was purchased to be part of: guardians, wraithguard, or warlocks."
|
Why did the berzerker cross the road?
Gwar! wrote:Willydstyle has it correct
Gwar! wrote:Yup you're absolutely right
New to the game and can't win? Read this.
|
|
|
|
|
2009/10/10 18:53:41
Subject: Conceal for vehicles?
|
|
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Willydstyle has it correct about Tri having it right.
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail. 
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
|
|
|
2009/10/10 19:54:38
Subject: Conceal for vehicles?
|
|
Shrieking Guardian Jetbiker
Los Angeles, CA
|
Gwar! wrote:Willydstyle has it correct about Tri having it right.
This is correct.
|
 Eldritch Raiders 2500
 Ogre Kingdoms 1500
 LotR-Mordor 750 |
|
|
|
|
2009/10/10 22:33:53
Subject: Conceal for vehicles?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Falconlance Johnson is right Gwar Johnson being right about Willydstyle Johnson being right about Tri Johnson having it right!
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/10/10 22:35:39
|
|
|
|
|
2009/10/10 22:53:47
Subject: Conceal for vehicles?
|
|
Infiltrating Hawwa'
|
jayjester wrote:Falconlance Johnson is right Gwar Johnson being right about Willydstyle Johnson being right about Tri Johnson having it right!
I concur.
|
DakkaDakka.com does not allow users to delete their accounts or content. We don't apologize for this. |
|
|
|
|
2009/10/11 01:25:52
Subject: Re:Conceal for vehicles?
|
|
Slaanesh Veteran Marine with Tentacles
|
I concur.
I'm going to have to disagree on moral grounds.
|
Slaneesh may seem fun now, but when you find yourself in bed with a he-goat and several implements of pain, you'll know you've gone too far. -Emperor's Faithful
"Oh, Brother Asmodai! Yes, spank me! I've been heretical!"
"Feel the Emperor's judgement, Azrael!"
"Oooh, yes! Purge me! Purge me!" -Cheese Elemental
'In the eye of Terror, it's still the '80's. And that's a good thing.' -Necroagogo |
|
|
|
|
2009/10/11 02:33:46
Subject: Re:Conceal for vehicles?
|
|
Furious Raptor
|
"With" != "embarked in"
A transport, even a dedicated one, is never part of the unit riding inside it.
-GK
|
Willydstyle wrote:Giantkiller, while those were very concise and logical rebuttals to the tenets upon which he based his argument... he made a post which was essentially a gentlemanly "bow out" from the debate, which should be respected.
GiantKiller: beating dead horses since 2006. |
|
|
|
|
2009/10/11 02:35:51
Subject: Conceal for vehicles?
|
|
Martial Arts Fiday
|
Che-Vito wrote:jayjester wrote:Falconlance Johnson is right Gwar Johnson being right about Willydstyle Johnson being right about Tri Johnson having it right!
I concur.
Che-Vito has the right of it. He probably owns a lot of Space Corridors as well. If not Industrial Towers.
|
"Holy Sh*&, you've opened my eyes and changed my mind about this topic, thanks Dakka OT!"
-Nobody Ever
Proverbs 18:2
"CHEESE!" is the battlecry of the ill-prepared.
 warboss wrote:
GW didn't mean to hit your wallet and I know they love you, baby. I'm sure they won't do it again so it's ok to purchase and make up. 
Albatross wrote:I think SlaveToDorkness just became my new hero.
EmilCrane wrote:Finecast is the new Matt Ward.
Don't mess with the Blade and Bolter! |
|
|
|
|
2009/10/11 12:48:52
Subject: Conceal for vehicles?
|
|
[DCM]
.
|
I guess we all CAN get along.
Asked and answered - now, locked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
