| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 10:47:12
Subject: Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Hi!
I just bought the new SW codex and when I read the longfang entry in the army list i asked myself: "Can a Long Fang Squad Leader be equipped with heavy weapons these days?"
As far as i know they've never been able to (not in the 2nd or the 3rd edition codexes)
But the Long Fang options section states that: "Each Long Fang apart from the Squad Leader must replace his bolt pistol with one of the following:..."
I believe you can interpret this in two different ways.
Either as in: The squad leader may but mustn't choose a heavy weapon apart from his troopers who clearly must choose a heavy weapon.
Or as in (which is more likely but not very clearly stated): The Squad Leader can't choose a heavy weapon apart from his troopers who must choose a heavy weapon.
Anyone got an answer?
|
Always outnumbered, never outgunned. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 11:43:31
Subject: Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
Roarin' Runtherd
|
Since the sentence you quoted excludes the Squad leader, it doesn't apply to him at all. He's allowed to buy off of the list that specifically applies to him, just above that heavy weapons list.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 11:46:42
Subject: Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine
Tau Player
|
Indeed. The bit only applies to the regular Long Fangs. Saying "apart from the Squad Leader" doesn't allow him the same just without the 'mandatory' bit. It only allows what it allows.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 12:58:12
Subject: Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
In any case, the Squad leader is a Squad Leader, not a Long Fang, as indicated on his profile
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 13:33:27
Subject: Re:Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
I do agree with you guys, mostly because I think that's the most resonable interpretation given the state of things. So I won't buy my Squad Leader a HW.
But if you read the text as it is you could also say that since the author makes a differece between Long Fangs and the Squad Leader only to tell that though being a Long Fang he does not have to take a HW he sort of implies that the Squad Leader as far as the text is concerned still is a Long Fang thus being able to take a HW. Its already stated that the squad consists of a Squad Leader and 1-5 Long Fangs, so they are already clearly devided. This makes the "apart from the Squad Leader" statement unnecessary unless the Squad Leader in this case (in the view of the author) counts as any other Long Fang (exept for his special rules, specialized equipment and the ability to choose whether or not to be equipped with a HW)...
This is just thoughts and I'm not 100% serious but I do think the text is vaguely phrased.
|
Always outnumbered, never outgunned. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 15:15:32
Subject: Re:Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
Horrific Howling Banshee
|
No squad leaders cannot have heavy weapons. But then again that is not why you buy them, you buy them for their fire-splitting ability. Which they can only use if they do not fire anyway.
Aramoro
|
Violence isn't the answer, I just like getting it wrong on purpose. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 16:04:38
Subject: Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
The New Miss Macross!
|
i take them and a heavy bolter armed long fang simply for ablative wounds. the heavy bolter goes first and then the sergeant. the two lascannons magically always survive until the end.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 16:09:37
Subject: Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Unless you take more than 2 wounding hits per time, in which case you are forced to allocate onto the otehr members of the squad.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 17:34:01
Subject: Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
The New Miss Macross!
|
nosferatu1001 wrote:Unless you take more than 2 wounding hits per time, in which case you are forced to allocate onto the otehr members of the squad.
very true. that rarely happens though since i tend to put them WAAAYYY back in the deployment zone in cover where only other 36-48" range weapons can hit them. between actually having to be in range, hit, and wound, not too many rounds make it inbound. the thunderwolves hurtling towards the enemies lines as well as two greyhunter rhinos and a full bloodclaw squad tend to take most of the incoming heavy fire. the old men usually just take pot shots from the back while having a few beers and smoking a cigar or two.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 18:55:50
Subject: Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I rather like the 20 point Heavy bolter Long Fangs on their own merits...
Jack
|
The rules:
1) Style over Substance.
2) Attitude is Everything.
3) Always take it to the Edge.
4) Break the Rules. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 19:16:46
Subject: Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Jackmojo wrote:I rather like the 20 point Heavy bolter Long Fangs on their own merits...
Jack
25 point Missile Launchers/Multi meltas are far better IMO.
Lascannons still suck bawls tho.
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 21:22:27
Subject: Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
HBs are not classed as small arms fire. 15 S5 AP4 shots will shred a lot of units including terminators and MCs.
G
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 21:27:06
Subject: Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
9 hits. 6 wounds. 1 dead terminator. Not exactly awe-inspiring. Even against orks, it's only 6 dead orks (assuming no cover, with cover, it's only 3). But, having said that, a full unit of LFs with 5 HBs is only 115 points.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/10/15 21:28:06
In the dark future, there are skulls for everyone. But only the bad guys get spikes. And rivets for all, apparently welding was lost in the Dark Age of Technology. -from C.Borer |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 22:22:28
Subject: Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
dietrich wrote:9 hits. 6 wounds. 1 dead terminator. Not exactly awe-inspiring. Even against orks, it's only 6 dead orks (assuming no cover, with cover, it's only 3). But, having said that, a full unit of LFs with 5 HBs is only 115 points.
Exactly, not that Missile Launchers aren't a valid choice, but the all HB squad has a delicious price tag for low point games.
In my army lists it replaces the HB/ AC predator as its slightly tougher and has better firepower. Well worth the extra 30 points to me
Jack
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/10/15 22:22:41
The rules:
1) Style over Substance.
2) Attitude is Everything.
3) Always take it to the Edge.
4) Break the Rules. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 22:35:38
Subject: Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
warboss wrote:i take them and a heavy bolter armed long fang simply for ablative wounds. the heavy bolter goes first and then the sergeant. the two lascannons magically always survive until the end. 
BS! My squad leader is always the last to die...no matter how many wounds I allocate to him
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 22:46:12
Subject: Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
Annoyed Blood Angel Devastator
Alaska
|
wyomingfox wrote:warboss wrote:i take them and a heavy bolter armed long fang simply for ablative wounds. the heavy bolter goes first and then the sergeant. the two lascannons magically always survive until the end. 
BS! My squad leader is always the last to die...no matter how many wounds I allocate to him 
Wow, you're lucky. Almost every time I allocate a wound to one of my Sergs without a Invuln, he just keels over.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/10/15 22:48:23
Current Army: Too many freaking Jump Packs 1500
Gwar! wrote:The newb has it right. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 22:50:34
Subject: Re:Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
c0un7_z3r0 wrote:But if you read the text as it is you could also say that since the author makes a differece between Long Fangs and the Squad Leader only to tell that though being a Long Fang he does not have to take a HW he sort of implies that the Squad Leader as far as the text is concerned still is a Long Fang thus being able to take a HW.
If the only reference to taking heavy weapons is the one that you've provided, then this logic doesn't work.
In order to be able to take a heavy weapon he needs a rule that specifically allows him to take one, not just one that says he doesn't have to.
Its already stated that the squad consists of a Squad Leader and 1-5 Long Fangs, so they are already clearly devided. This makes the "apart from the Squad Leader" statement unnecessary unless the Squad Leader in this case (in the view of the author) counts as any other Long Fang (exept for his special rules, specialized equipment and the ability to choose whether or not to be equipped with a HW)...
I suspect that you'll find that GW don't share the commonly held belief around here that squad leaders or upgrades aren't the same thing as the rest of their squad. The distinction is there because in GW parlance the unit is a unit of Long Fangs, which consists of a number of Long Fangs and a Squad Leader. As a part of the unit the Squad Leader is still a Long Fang (as in, part of the unit named 'Long Fangs')... he's just not a Long Fang (as in the basic unit trooper).
It's sloppy writing, but works if you don't think about it too hard.
Because, of course, it falls down elsewhere... any unit able to take a 'Land Raider' as a transport, for example, would also by extension be able to take a Redeemer or Crusader, since they're also Land Raiders.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/10/15 22:52:44
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/15 23:13:29
Subject: Long Fang Squad Leader.
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
Eternal Newb wrote:wyomingfox wrote:warboss wrote:i take them and a heavy bolter armed long fang simply for ablative wounds. the heavy bolter goes first and then the sergeant. the two lascannons magically always survive until the end. 
BS! My squad leader is always the last to die...no matter how many wounds I allocate to him 
Wow, you're lucky. Almost every time I allocate a wound to one of my Sergs without a Invuln, he just keels over.
 Him making his save usually means that I won't make a save on ML bearing LF  .
Cheaky Git
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|