Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/23 19:59:20
Subject: Dark Angels fluff question
|
 |
Irked Blood Angel Scout with Combat Knife
|
Okay, so I've got a DA army, and am slowly massing a farsight tau force, my question, kinda because I'll probably do it anyway, is, would it be plausible for the dark angels in all their secret agendaness align themselves( temporarily anyway) with xenos such as tau and eldar to get a shot at the fallen. I think it'd be a cool idea for the tau at theperdus rift to let some DA join in against some chaos seeping through.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/23 20:19:46
Subject: Re:Dark Angels fluff question
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
The Dark Angels were the most xenophobic marines in the rules and had restrictions to allies.
I dont think its a good idea to use DA alongside any xenos race.
To prove their loyality, the DA would just annihilate the xenos and take any info from them.
You dont want to mess with those interrogator-chaplains.....
The only short time period you may cover, would be with some fallen around ( = primary target ) and the xenos erased later
( = secondary target ) , just a short lived silent agreement.
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/23 20:27:12
Subject: Dark Angels fluff question
|
 |
Nasty Nob on a Boar
|
But since Asmodai was removed from this codex series, why not?
And if you're going to use "two" broken codex's, the floor is all yours
Though it's funny as I'm also considering a Tau force to fight my Angels.
|
No madam, 40,000 is the year that this game is set in. Not how much it costs. Though you may have a point. - GW Fulchester
The Gatling Guns have flamethrowers on them because this is 40k - DOW III
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/10/23 20:57:23
Subject: Dark Angels fluff question
|
 |
Lethal Lhamean
|
In the fluff it wouldn't happen but for a game sure.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/11/01 15:00:16
Subject: Re:Dark Angels fluff question
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
The old Codex states as a special rule:
"The dark angels refuse to fight alongside non-humans except under the most dire of circumstances."
And this even includes Ogryns and Ratlings.
Simply because they dont want xenos poking around in their business.
I think they skipped this rule in the new codex though.
And yes, DA is the most xenophobic legion.
|
Angels of Absolution 2500pts
 />
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/11/01 16:48:24
Subject: Dark Angels fluff question
|
 |
The New Miss Macross!
|
agreed. the DA would be one of the chapters MOST against fighting alongside xenos.
|
|
 |
 |
|