| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2009/12/30 17:37:50
Subject: Which Termagant Upgrades?
|
|
Umber Guard
|
So, as stated in the title, which upgrade should I get for my Termagants
I was personally thinking getting a Flesborer with Toxin Sacs (+1 S)
What do you guys think?
Thanks in advance =)
|
Lord Scythican wrote:
You know what is worse than not getting jokes?
The Holocaust.
|
|
|
 |
|
2009/12/31 02:47:44
Subject: Which Termagant Upgrades?
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
Not shure yet without seeing the whole codex in english. ButI am assuming more numbers might be better off instead of having a higher strength.
You are talking about the new Tyranid codex right? I don't think you can get that biomorph for the 5th, so igonre what I said for 5th edtion codex. for 4th editon, why bother, it's only 2 more weeks away to start a 4th edtion army.
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
|
|
|
2009/12/31 02:50:35
Subject: Which Termagant Upgrades?
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Don't the sacs give it Poison?
|
|
|
|
|
2009/12/31 02:52:45
Subject: Which Termagant Upgrades?
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
Nurglitch wrote:Don't the sacs give it Poison?
I think it does, that is why I changed my mind in mid sentance. I wasn't shure what edtion he is refering too.
What ever you do, to the OP, please don't start anything yet till the new codex comes out, unless you know what the new rules are. I am assuming you don't so don't model and glue anything yet.
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
|
|
|
2009/12/31 03:27:21
Subject: Which Termagant Upgrades?
|
|
Executing Exarch
|
If you plan on using the 4th ed codex for a while I would go with spinefists.
Why waste points on cannon fodder? Its not like they are going to kill anything most of the time.
|
|
|
|
|
2009/12/31 03:31:26
Subject: Re:Which Termagant Upgrades?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Fleshborers will be the cheapest option in the 5th edition codex, so I'd go with those. If you plan to run tervigons (and you should, because they're sweet) you'll need lots of gaunts with fleshborers because those are the kind they make.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
