Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/01/07 20:42:20
Subject: Necrons WBB ruling in SWs FAQ
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
|
Hi there, not all too familiar with the Necron rules, so forgive me if I'm mistaken, but I seem to remember that there's a lot of debate about whether or not they can make a Will Be Back roll after being Swept by a Sweeping Advance.
In the new Space Wolves FAQ it says that:
Q. Are models with an ability to return to play
(e.g. Necrons, St. Celestine, etc) able to use their
special rule even after being removed from play
by The Last Laugh?
A. Yes they can. It sounds odd but their special
ability works just fine.
Doesn't this seem to indicate that Necrons would be able to make a WBB roll after any effect that removed them from play? And as such, would they be able to make a WBB after being Swept by Sweeping Advance? Or am I reading too much into this...
Cheers
Gorlak
|
Saddened on behalf of all the Ultramarines, Salamanders and White Scars players who got their Codex rolled into Codex: Black Templars. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/01/07 20:46:14
Subject: Necrons WBB ruling in SWs FAQ
|
 |
Huge Bone Giant
|
The stasis states removed as a casualty. Thus, the models can come back. The others remove from play.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/01/07 20:46:30
"It is not the bullet with your name on it that should worry you, it's the one labeled "To whom it may concern. . ."
DQ:70S++G+++MB+I+Pwhfb06+D++A+++/aWD-R++++T(D)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/01/07 20:46:35
Subject: Necrons WBB ruling in SWs FAQ
|
 |
Loyal Necron Lychguard
|
No. Lukas's Stasis ability removes models in base contact as casualties, triggering WBB. SA does not.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/01/07 20:49:02
Subject: Necrons WBB ruling in SWs FAQ
|
 |
Combat Jumping Ragik
|
Reading too much into it. If they are sweeping advanced then they are gone.
|
Trade rules: lower rep trades ships 1st. - I ship within 2 business days, if it will be longer I will contact you & explain. - I will NOT lie on customs forms, it's a felony, do not ask me to mark sales as "gifts". Free shipping applies to contiguous US states. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/01/07 20:49:46
Subject: Necrons WBB ruling in SWs FAQ
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
As an additional difference, Sweeping Advance specifies that special abilities don't save against it. Last Laugh does not.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/01/07 20:55:19
Subject: Necrons WBB ruling in SWs FAQ
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Also, please note that Celestine does NOT get to come back, as the wording is different. The GW FAQ is wrong. As for sweeping advance, Not this again. SA clearly states nothing can save the model, Last Laugh does not.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2010/01/07 20:56:31
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/01/07 21:13:11
Subject: Necrons WBB ruling in SWs FAQ
|
 |
Sslimey Sslyth
|
I'm still amused by the inclusion of Titans in the list of things that can be affected. Time to get that unit of Bloodclaws to go give that Reaver a hug....
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/01/07 23:56:11
Subject: Re:Necrons WBB ruling in SWs FAQ
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
|
Didn't understand the first 8 people clearly enough. Won't 12 more please write and say "no"
But yeah yeah... I guess I didn't stumble upon some nugget of gold
|
Saddened on behalf of all the Ultramarines, Salamanders and White Scars players who got their Codex rolled into Codex: Black Templars. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/01/07 23:58:33
Subject: Re:Necrons WBB ruling in SWs FAQ
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Gorlack wrote:Didn't understand the first 8 people clearly enough. Won't 12 more please write and say "no"
But yeah yeah... I guess I didn't stumble upon some nugget of gold 
No.
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/01/08 01:05:11
Subject: Re:Necrons WBB ruling in SWs FAQ
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Gorlack wrote:Didn't understand the first 8 people clearly enough. Won't 12 more please write and say "no"
But yeah yeah... I guess I didn't stumble upon some nugget of gold 
Hey dakka is nothing if not INCREDIBLY efficient with clear answers
|
|
 |
 |
|