| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2010/02/16 22:01:40
Subject: Heavy weapon team disembark
|
|
Sniping Gŭiláng
|
Well, there is one thing that came out in game today. I Wanted to get my infantry squad with autocannon out of shaken transport. BRB says that you have to place models within 2" from access point. Well HWT base is 2,5" so it is impossible to place it within 2". Hell, you cannot even make emergency disembark, because you still have to be within 2" from hull. So, my question is: Do you really have to have your transport blown up to leave it, or am i getting something wrong?
|
"Any problem caused by a tank, can be solved by a tank." - Peter Griffin
|
|
|
 |
|
2010/02/16 22:03:23
Subject: Heavy weapon team disembark
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Kubik wrote:Well, there is one thing that came out in game today. I Wanted to get my infantry squad with autocannon out of shaken transport. BRB says that you have to place models within 2" from access point. Well HWT base is 2,5" so it is impossible to place it within 2". Hell, you cannot even make emergency disembark, because you still have to be within 2" from hull. So, my question is: Do you really have to have your transport blown up to leave it, or am i getting something wrong?
Take a look in the brb for a good example. If any part of the base is within 2" you are fine. You can have any piece of the base just barely within the 2 " and be legally disembarked.
|
Gwar: I'm going to quit while I can.
Meh, close enough  |
|
|
|
|
2010/02/16 22:10:15
Subject: Heavy weapon team disembark
|
|
Sniping Gŭiláng
|
ah, ok, didn't notice the guy with launcher. THX
|
"Any problem caused by a tank, can be solved by a tank." - Peter Griffin
|
|
|
|
|
2010/02/16 22:53:24
Subject: Heavy weapon team disembark
|
|
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
Just for clarity, any time you measure distances involving a model, you measure to the closest edge of the model's base.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010/02/16 22:51:29
Subject: Heavy weapon team disembark
|
|
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills
|
When GW uses "within" when talking about distances, they use it in the sense of "within arm's reach", not "within my belly".
They gave a nice clear diagram at the front of the main rulebook in 5th.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/02/16 22:51:51
Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.
Maelstrom's Edge! |
|
|
|
|
2010/02/16 23:41:20
Subject: Heavy weapon team disembark
|
|
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Mannahnin wrote:When GW uses "within" when talking about distances, they use it in the sense of "within arm's reach", not "within my belly".
They gave a nice clear diagram at the front of the main rulebook in 5th.
I'm pretty sure you are keeping nice cut and paste answers for some of these. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
