| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2010/04/05 22:20:02
Subject: What year is this.... Who's in charge here?!?!
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
2010/04/05 22:22:19
Subject: What year is this.... Who's in charge here?!?!
|
|
Battlefield Professional
Empire Of Denver, Urth
|
Eloi and tweed!?
Too funny.
|
“It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood” -- Karl Popper |
|
|
|
|
2010/04/05 23:10:45
Subject: What year is this.... Who's in charge here?!?!
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
Manchester UK
|
Ha. Yes, very good.
|
 Cheesecat wrote:
I almost always agree with Albatross, I can't see why anyone wouldn't.
|
|
|
|
|
2010/04/05 23:14:16
Subject: Re:What year is this.... Who's in charge here?!?!
|
|
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
Haha nice one.
|
 Hail to the creeeeeeeeeeeeeeed!baby Ask not the moot a question,for he will give you three answers,all of which will result in a public humiliation.
My DIY chapter Fire Wraiths http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/264338.page
3 things that Ivan likes:
Food Sex Machines
Tactical Genius of DakkaDakka
Colonel Miles Quaritch is my hero
|
|
|
|
|
2010/04/05 23:39:47
Subject: What year is this.... Who's in charge here?!?!
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Kit Kats for everyone? Read the time stamp on the news story and tell me that is not an April Fool's joke of some kind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010/04/05 23:43:14
Subject: What year is this.... Who's in charge here?!?!
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
Manchester UK
|
Well, yes.
|
Cheesecat wrote:
I almost always agree with Albatross, I can't see why anyone wouldn't.
|
|
|
|
|
2010/04/05 23:46:08
Subject: What year is this.... Who's in charge here?!?!
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Really?!? Who'd 'ave thunk it!?!...............
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010/04/05 23:53:58
Subject: What year is this.... Who's in charge here?!?!
|
|
Battlefield Professional
Empire Of Denver, Urth
|
You mean there is not really someone called Eloi Cole?
I'm creastfallen.
|
“It is impossible to speak in such a way that you cannot be misunderstood” -- Karl Popper |
|
|
|
|
2010/04/06 03:26:31
Subject: What year is this.... Who's in charge here?!?!
|
|
Executing Exarch
|
What is that nonsense about, "rather too much tweed for his age?" That is absolute rubbish!
|
DR:80+S(GT)G++M++B-I++Pwmhd05#+D+++A+++/sWD-R++T(Ot)DM+
How is it they live in such harmony - the billions of stars - when most men can barely go a minute without declaring war in their minds about someone they know.
- St. Thomas Aquinas
Warhammer 40K:
 Alpha Legion - 15,000 pts For the Emperor!
 WAAAGH! Skullhooka - 14,000 pts
 Biel Tan Strikeforce - 11,000 pts
"The Eldar get no attention because the average male does not like confetti blasters, shimmer shields or sparkle lasers."
-Illeix |
|
|
|
|
2010/04/06 03:58:40
Subject: Re:What year is this.... Who's in charge here?!?!
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
This story is too cool. I'm going to ignore all the coincidental 'evidence' that this story is a hoax and take this story as truth.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/04/06 03:59:13
|
|
|
|
|
2010/04/06 06:57:07
Subject: What year is this.... Who's in charge here?!?!
|
|
[MOD]
Madrak Ironhide
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010/04/06 10:32:41
Subject: What year is this.... Who's in charge here?!?!
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Wait.. what?
|
|
|
|
|
2010/04/08 02:47:32
Subject: What year is this.... Who's in charge here?!?!
|
|
[MOD]
Otiose in a Niche
|
Not bad at all though a bit too tongue in cheek, they should have played it straight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
