Switch Theme:

I'm rethinking the use of Railgun Hammerheads  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Sword-Bearing Inquisitorial Crusader





Cleveland, Ohio

I'm still using Railheads, and don't have any complaints. The real trick is to make sure you don't have unrealistic expectations of them. Railheads are an anti-Infantry unit first, and anti-Tank second. I also prefer the BC varients, they're a little cheaper and if I'm getting close enough to use the SMS or BC, then it's going to be very concentrated firepower in order to completely eliminate the targets.

I'm a wierd Tau player though, I'm very agressive (Mass Tank Shock FTW), don't use Broadsides or Markerlights, and use a bunch of Piranha. Hammerheads just fit better with my game, Broadsides are too much of an anchor and make me feel too attached to a particular part of the board.

Bottom line is, it really depends on what you need in the list, Broadsides are good, Railheads are good, they just have different jobs.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/04/17 01:27:46


 
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: