| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/23 08:30:27
Subject: What can BA take from main SM codex?
|
 |
Armored Iron Breaker
|
Hi all,
I used search but couldn't find an answer. My question is specific SM codex like Blood Angels, for example, what can they use from the main codex? Aside from house rules...
Can they use Telion?
Can they use the Thunder Fire Cannon?
Can they use any HQ listed in the SM codex for any reason?
The argument I hear is whatever isn't listed in the Blood Angels codex can't be used, but is this entirely true? I see Some Space Marine chapters like BT and DA running Telion, yet he's only listed in the main SM codex. On one hand I agree since it's a new chapter and doesn't really need anything, but on the other hand how do players use their other models like TFC not listed in BA codex?
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/23 08:35:03
Subject: What can BA take from main SM codex?
|
 |
Ultramarine Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control
|
Short answer is no. If it isn't in the Blood Angels codex, you cannot put it in a Blood Angels army. The same thing applies to people running Dark Angel, Space Wolves and Black Templar (and vanilla SM) codices too. Each is completely seperate and you cannot use anything from a different codex in your army.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/04/23 08:35:37
While you sleep, they'll be waiting...
Have you thought about the Axis of Evil pension scheme? |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/23 08:44:35
Subject: What can BA take from main SM codex?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
They cannot use anything.
The reason BT etc can uuse items found in other codexes is they are a "supplement" codex, meant to be used in conjunction with the main SM one.
Blood Angels, like SW, DA etc, have a *full* codex. Nothing outside of the codex can be used.
In short: it doesnt say you *can*, so you *can't*
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/23 09:23:21
Subject: What can BA take from main SM codex?
|
 |
Sneaky Sniper Drone
|
nosferatu1001 wrote:They cannot use anything.
The reason BT etc can uuse items found in other codexes is they are a "supplement" codex, meant to be used in conjunction with the main SM one.
What?
REALLY?
When did this happen...?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/23 09:26:32
Subject: What can BA take from main SM codex?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
WEl, BT possibly are - you know they are if they lack "standard" units like Predators etc.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/23 09:27:50
Subject: What can BA take from main SM codex?
|
 |
Ultramarine Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control
|
@nosferatu1001 - are you thinking of the old Codex:Armageddon supplement?
They haven't been able to use stuff from the main dex since they got their own book AFAIK.
|
While you sleep, they'll be waiting...
Have you thought about the Axis of Evil pension scheme? |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/23 09:35:50
Subject: What can BA take from main SM codex?
|
 |
Sneaky Sniper Drone
|
nosferatu1001 wrote:WEl, BT possibly are - you know they are if they lack "standard" units like Predators etc.
Psst...
I have predators in my codex
Page 41
and rhinos, and razorbacks, and all others sorts of toys
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/23 09:38:47
Subject: What can BA take from main SM codex?
|
 |
Hurr! Ogryn Bone 'Ead!
|
BT have a stand alone codex. The only reason they should be using anything from the SM codex if they have a BT "painted" army and are playing them as a "count as" army using only the SM codex. Other then that maybe house rules?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/23 09:46:22
Subject: What can BA take from main SM codex?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Chimera_Calvin wrote:@nosferatu1001 - are you thinking of the old Codex:Armageddon supplement?
They haven't been able to use stuff from the main dex since they got their own book AFAIK.
Oops, that would be Friday tiredness kicking in, and old-fart syndrome
Certainly DA cannot use anyone such as Tellion, you really should correct people on this - DA havea FULL codex. In fact I think *all* SM "supplement" codexes now have full books, so noone should be going outside their own book!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/23 11:08:06
Subject: What can BA take from main SM codex?
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
Yep, SW were the last suplement codex left and they've been updated now. I guess that OP (or the people he plays with) is thinking of the 3rd edition chapter codexes.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/04/23 11:08:25
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/23 13:26:46
Subject: What can BA take from main SM codex?
|
 |
Rotting Sorcerer of Nurgle
|
@OP:
Get the New codex, crack that thing open, and then see for yourself.
The BA don't have to take anything out of the C;SM codex as they have pretty much what? 70% of the same units.../facepalm.
|
This is a little story about four people named Everybody, Somebody, Anybody, and Nobody.
There was an important job to be done and Everybody was sure that Somebody would do it.
Anybody could have done it, but Nobody did it.
Somebody got angry about that because it was Everybody's job.
Everybody thought that Anybody could do it, but Nobody realized that Everybody wouldn't do it.
It ended up that Everybody blamed Somebody when Nobody did what Anybody could have done.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/23 15:22:16
Subject: What can BA take from main SM codex?
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
|
The only way something like this could legally happen is if you are using allies via either the Daemonhunters or Witch Hunters books. At least outside of 'Ard Boyz. Otherwise, if it is not in your army's book, you can't use it.
Homer
|
The only "hobby" GW is interested in is lining their pockets with your money.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/23 16:10:13
Subject: What can BA take from main SM codex?
|
 |
Implacable Black Templar Initiate
|
Chi3f wrote:I see Some Space Marine chapters like BT and DA running Telion, yet he's only listed in the main SM codex. On one hand I agree since it's a new chapter and doesn't really need anything, but on the other hand how do players use their other models like TFC not listed in BA codex?
BT and DA cannot use Telion or any of the other cool leaders in C: SM. Black Templar is not a supliment codex and neither is Dark Angels. If they are using him in a Black Templar army, their list is illegal.
GOD I wish I could though
But as be stated you can't use stuff not in your codex. So yeah no thunder flare cannons for BA. Just like no Storm Ravens for anyone else!
|
Rejoice in furious challenge, and avenging strife, whose works with woe embitter human life! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/23 18:04:13
Subject: What can BA take from main SM codex?
|
 |
Death-Dealing Ultramarine Devastator
|
Short answer; Nope...
|
Nivondu
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/24 06:10:29
Subject: What can BA take from main SM codex?
|
 |
Armored Iron Breaker
|
Sanctjud wrote:@OP:
Get the New codex, crack that thing open, and then see for yourself.
The BA don't have to take anything out of the C;SM codex as they have pretty much what? 70% of the same units.../facepalm.
Yeah I have it and it's a great read lol. I was asking for a friend that bought my Ultra Smurfs last year and is now running BA. He has been using Telion, Shrike, and the TFC up until now so I just wanted better clarification on what could be used.
I agree, though, that complete codex shouldn't/don't need to use anything outside their codex.
Thanks
EDIT: I threw in BT and DA since I've seen a few armies running Telion, but it makes sense that they wouldn't be included.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/04/24 06:12:08
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|