Switch Theme:

Legality of creating your own range of models for 40k?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Infiltrating Broodlord





USA

Fateweaver wrote:Chapterhouse has been spending money to work with GW's lawyers to make sure they aren't breaking any IP laws.

As with all businesses they spend money to make money. It might seem crossing the line but apparently GW legal has given them the okay on everything.

In another thread someone asked about female IG and one of the guys from Chapterhouse said they could make female models that look similiar to IG cadians but would have to consult with GW's IP laywers which will cost them money so they haven't given it a whole lot of thought due to needing to be sure demand is high enough before investing money to keep everything legit.

Hence, no C&D because GW has given them permission to do what they do.


While I would love to keep this idea out there (it is rather fun) I have to say that I have never spoken to GWs Attorneys or plan to unless it is in court.

We do have our own IP attorney that keeps us honest. To be frank a lot of IP law is very much in grey area. I can probably count the number of attorneys who have any idea how to handle Miniature Wargame Sculpting IP!

So in essence, we dont work with GW, or plan too (I wouldnt be opposed to it, but I am a realist and know GW will not work with any miniature company).

While we do have a complete figure here and there, most of our stuff REQUIRES GW minis to be bought before you can use ours. If anything we add value to GWs products, and I think a Judge or Jury would sit and laugh if GW claimed we took any profits from them.

Nick
Made in us
Infiltrating Broodlord





USA

I believe the "Aliens" line of toys/action figures called the marines "Colonial Space Marines".
Made in us
Infiltrating Broodlord





USA

Wow... why does it look like GW took 50% of that directly and made it into a terminator?

Thats a nice model too for the times
Made in us
Infiltrating Broodlord





USA

Wow... yeah, thats sorta sad knowing that now..
Made in us
Infiltrating Broodlord





USA

Would this screw up this whole argument?

Kenner Aliens Space Marine Toy
Made in us
Infiltrating Broodlord





USA

Seeing that that toy and GWs trademark were in existance at the same time and GW did nothing to prevent them using "Space Marine" does the give precedence to another company doing the same safely?

 
Forum Index » Dakka Discussions
Go to: