Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Ouze wrote: As I understand it, if you have multiple saves available, you must pick "the best one". Does that mean the best one numerically, or the best one situationally?

Unfortunately, you've hit one of those topics that gets discussed to death on a regular basis with no clear consensus.

There are several different viewpoints:
- You must choose the best save numerically
- You must choose the best save based on the situation or
- You aren't actually required to use the best save, you just have the ability to do so, and which one you use is entirely up to the player.


From my experience, the third one is really how it winds up being played. I've never seen a situation arise on the table where a player has questioned the save their opponent chooses to use.


Locking this one now, as it will inevitably spiral down into the same tired old argument as last time.