Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/05/30 15:28:47
Subject: Rapid Fire 2?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Would it make sense? like it would be that you get 4 shots up to 12" or 2 up to max range if havn't moved. Main gun that came to mind when i think of rapid fire 2 would be a lasgun on full-auto.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/05/30 15:33:38
Subject: Rapid Fire 2?
|
 |
Combat Jumping Ragik
|
I think rapid fire is fine as is. Yes lasguns are terrible but the trade-off is you have a ton on them.
|
Trade rules: lower rep trades ships 1st. - I ship within 2 business days, if it will be longer I will contact you & explain. - I will NOT lie on customs forms, it's a felony, do not ask me to mark sales as "gifts". Free shipping applies to contiguous US states. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/05/30 16:28:27
Subject: Rapid Fire 2?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
That's what FRFSRF is for.
|
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/05/30 18:42:39
Subject: Rapid Fire 2?
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
|
Oh man, I hate the first rank fire second rank fire thing
Took out one whole squad of necron warriors
|
1500pt O'Vesa Star W: 27 D: 2 L: 1
The challenge: in a 1500pt game I will play 900pt + D6x100 pts, if I roll a 6 I reroll and -100 to that second number (down to 1000pt minimum)
W:6 D:0 L:1 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/05/30 20:38:23
Subject: Rapid Fire 2?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Well, not from a balance pov. But wouldn't it make sense to have them be able to go full-auto and get rapid fire two(and still be able to get FRFSRF) but run out of ammo then?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/05/30 22:00:39
Subject: Rapid Fire 2?
|
 |
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine
|
Most lasgun patterns aren't able to go full auto but, the way shooting rapid fire works, it isn't the troops just shooting off two shots. It's merely representing the amount of effective fire that can cause casualties. Or in some cases fewer shots at a longer range because they need to spend time aiming.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/05/30 23:07:34
Subject: Rapid Fire 2?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
Yeah. Neither most lasgun models nor most bolter models are rapid fire.
|
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/05/31 03:53:03
Subject: Rapid Fire 2?
|
 |
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak
|
Wings of Purity wrote:Oh man, I hate the first rank fire second rank fire thing
Took out one whole squad of necron warriors
Really? With around 180 guys within 12", all firing frfsrf, you'll get about 15 necrons killed. Must have been remarkable dice.
|
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. |
|
 |
 |
|