Switch Theme:

Black Templar army list... which codex?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Raging-on-the-Inside Blood Angel Sergeant





Lawrenceville, New Jersey, USA

So I've recently gotten back into 40k and my army is going to be a Black Templar Crusade. The question is, which Codex?

THe original BT codex is still good but not really built to the newest editions specifications. The new space marine codex obviously lacks the BT feel and make up.

Which should I use?

The black rage is within us all. Lies offer no shield against the inevitable. You speak of donning the black of duty for the red of brotherhood; but it is the black of rage you shall wear when the darkness comes for you. 
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard






I thought you HAD to use the BT codex if you wanted to play BT?
   
Made in ca
Renegade Inquisitor with a Bound Daemon





Tied and gagged in the back of your car

BT codex. It's got plenty of flavour, and is still a good codex.
   
Made in gb
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime







Kevin949 wrote:I thought you HAD to use the BT codex if you wanted to play BT?
No, not at all. You can paint your models however you damn well please, and use whatever codex you want.

If I want to run my Space Wolves as Blood Angels, I can. What I can't do is use both sets of rules.

Dark Angels players are close to FORCED to do this to ever win a game.

In any case, I would actually go for the Blood Angels codex. Fits their Theme more.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/06/07 06:31:46


Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!)
 
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard






Gwar! wrote:
Kevin949 wrote:I thought you HAD to use the BT codex if you wanted to play BT?
No, not at all. You can paint your models however you damn well please, and use whatever codex you want.

If I want to run my Space Wolves as Blood Angels, I can. What I can't do is use both sets of rules.

Dark Angels players are close to FORCED to do this to ever win a game.

In any case, I would actually go for the Blood Angels codex. Fits their Theme more.


No I get that, but I think he is asking if he can play black templars but use the space marine codex instead of the BT codex. I get that you can paint SM whatever you want and use whatever codex, but if he has BT painted marines and uses the SM codex, then they're not 'really' BT are they?
   
Made in es
Martial Arts SAS





Pamplona, Spain

I like better the BT codex.


 
   
Made in us
Raging-on-the-Inside Blood Angel Sergeant





Lawrenceville, New Jersey, USA

I've got both codexes and am leaning towards the BT one. The only reason I ask is because the BT codex is very dated when compared to the newer codex SM.

The black rage is within us all. Lies offer no shield against the inevitable. You speak of donning the black of duty for the red of brotherhood; but it is the black of rage you shall wear when the darkness comes for you. 
   
Made in us
Boosting Black Templar Biker




California

Generalstoner wrote:I've got both codexes and am leaning towards the BT one. The only reason I ask is because the BT codex is very dated when compared to the newer codex SM.
Your Rhinos's are more expensive for less equipment, your TH/SS works a little different, you still have to take target priority tests (IIRC), and your LR is not technically an assault vehicle. On the other hand you still have the Master of Sanctrity as a chaplain option, all your models are feerless in CC, you have the emperors champion (and all his lovely vows), you have the option of having a 20 man tactical squad made up of 10 marines and 10 "scouts", and you can take terminator command squads.

And their fluff is still the best marine fluff around.
   
Made in us
Consigned to the Grim Darkness





USA

Personally I prefer SW fluff, but essentially Zeshin's right. C:BT is not a bad codex.

The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog
 
   
Made in au
Rogue Grot Kannon Gunna





Kevin949 wrote:...if he has BT painted marines and uses the SM codex, then they're not 'really' BT are they?


Repeat after me: The game rules are not the world physics. If I use BA rules for my Night Lords army, are you going to say that they're not 'really' a chaos army?
   
Made in se
Ferocious Black Templar Castellan






Sweden

zeshin wrote:
Generalstoner wrote:I've got both codexes and am leaning towards the BT one. The only reason I ask is because the BT codex is very dated when compared to the newer codex SM.
Your Rhinos's are more expensive for less equipment, your TH/SS works a little different, you still have to take target priority tests (IIRC), and your LR is not technically an assault vehicle. On the other hand you still have the Master of Sanctrity as a chaplain option, all your models are feerless in CC, you have the emperors champion (and all his lovely vows), you have the option of having a 20 man tactical squad made up of 10 marines and 10 "scouts", and you can take terminator command squads.

And their fluff is still the best marine fluff around.


We also get the most blatantly obvious popular culture reference, the Holy Orbs of Antioch. And they're actually good!

For thirteen years I had a dog with fur the darkest black. For thirteen years he was my friend, oh how I want him back. 
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard






WARBOSS TZOO wrote:
Kevin949 wrote:...if he has BT painted marines and uses the SM codex, then they're not 'really' BT are they?


Repeat after me: The game rules are not the world physics. If I use BA rules for my Night Lords army, are you going to say that they're not 'really' a chaos army?


First off, you don't have to be a jerk about it. Secondly, if you're not using the chaos codex then no, they're not chaos. Even if they're painted like it or whatever. If you're going off of BA dex with choas models, you're playing BA. What do physics have anything to do with this?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/06/07 20:32:52


 
   
Made in us
Consigned to the Grim Darkness





USA

You might be playing C:BA, but your army doesn't have to be Blood Angels.

The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog
 
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard






Melissia wrote:You might be playing C:BA, but your army doesn't have to be Blood Angels.


Right, and like I said previously, I understand that. But if you're playing by different rules then what your army is originally modeled for, you're just proxying. I get that its easy to proxy with marines but come on, you can't say you're not playing BA or BT ir you're using their codex. like I said, I wouldn't care if someone brought BT painted marines and wanted to play the space wolves codex or BA codex or whatever other SM codex they wanted to play, but I wouldn't put up a batrep as me vs. BT when they used another codex.
   
Made in us
Consigned to the Grim Darkness





USA

And yet, you're not playing Blood Angels. You're playing C:BA. The difference is very important.

The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog
 
   
Made in ca
Flashy Flashgitz





Aurora ON

Can you two drop this? This is getting silly.
And I agree with most of the posters, C:BT would be best.

whalemusic360 wrote:
DBZ referance. Gotta be a special kinda nerd to get that one.


Whew, I can finally unclench my anus.  
   
Made in gb
Black Templar Recruit Undergoing Surgeries




Scotland

I would also back the Templar codex. plus in my experience the dated wargear is not an issue as the manger of my local store forces all SM players to use 5th ed rules for Thunder hammers and storm shields.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2010/06/08 13:21:50


 
   
Made in us
Bounding Assault Marine




Redlands, California

I'd go with the Blood Angels codex. Seems to fit their fluff quite well and the current BT dex is pretty dated.

Beakie Space Marine P&M Blog
https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/745028.page 
   
Made in ie
Implacable Black Templar Initiate




Dublin, Ireland

Go for black templars, they may be outdated but that makes almost no difference! They are (in my opinion) MUCH MUCH better than codex marines. Vows are great and all the special rules give you a feeling that you are actually playing bt instead of sm. Sure ur rhino costs more but cheaper dreadnoughts, vindictators and extra armor more than make up!

(\ __ /)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny
(")_(") to help him gain world domination


 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: