Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/10 23:58:17
Subject: Ridiculous argument on assaulting.
|
 |
Napoleonics Obsesser
|
Simple. Me and one of my friends were have a game of Tyranids v. Marines,with me playing nids.
So,later in the game,I FINALLY get into assaulting range with his footslogging marines, and I throw a unit of hormaguants at him. This assault continues for a turn. I'm winning slightly.
On my next turn, I move a unit of genestealers into assault range of this existing Assault,and I make a charge towards the side of his unit. He says I can't do this....what?
I don't understand. There's a list of disallowed assaults,and none of them say you can't assault an enemy unit in CC already. There are several references to my scenario in the BRB. I thought this was the entire goal of initiative.
Anyway, Can I do this,or is it disallowed?
|
If only ZUN!bar were here... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/11 00:01:00
Subject: Ridiculous argument on assaulting.
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
|
Yes you can. It is covered in the BRB under "Multiple Assaults"
|
MeanGreenStompa wrote:The idea of Land Raider rarity is a lie, there are millions of them, they reproduce like tribbles. Ask the Blood Angels, they have so many they even throw them out of thunderhawks moving at high speed to try and reduce the numbers.
DR:80+SGM-B+I--Pw40k09#+D++A+/hWD350R++T(M)DM+
My Army
Orks 2500+ pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/11 00:02:45
Subject: Ridiculous argument on assaulting.
|
 |
Napoleonics Obsesser
|
All I needed to hear,thank you. I can figure out the rest from there.
|
If only ZUN!bar were here... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/11 00:05:32
Subject: Ridiculous argument on assaulting.
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Yes, you can do this. Your friend was wrong.
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/11 01:37:10
Subject: Ridiculous argument on assaulting.
|
 |
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh
|
Unless you had totally surrounded the marines with your gaunts and it was impossible for you to make it into assault with the marines. You cannot just pile up the Genestealers on the outside of the assault.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/11 02:27:01
Subject: Ridiculous argument on assaulting.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Yes you need to have at least one genestealer in base contact for the assault to be legal.
|
There's just an acre of you fellas, isn't there? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/11 10:21:43
Subject: Re:Ridiculous argument on assaulting.
|
 |
Stealthy Dark Angels Scout with Shotgun
|
If you can only have a 1 unit vs 1 unit fight, then what is to stop someone with, say a 30 man DC squad, just annihilating everything because you can't use numbers to kill them.
As people above have said, if you can get at least one genestealer into base contact with his unit, you can charge.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/11 12:56:39
Subject: Ridiculous argument on assaulting.
|
 |
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh
|
pssst...you kill DC with shooting. Trying to do so in assault is painful....
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/11 13:53:59
Subject: Ridiculous argument on assaulting.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
And worse still, his Marines couldn't even hit back at the Genestealers till the next assault phase....
|
"Dakkanaut" not "Dakkaite"
Only with Minatures, does size matter...
"Only the living collect a pension"Johannes VII
"If the ork codex and 5th were developed near the same time, any possible nerf will be pre-planned."-malfred
"I'd do it but the GW Website makes my eyes hurt. "Gwar
"That would be page 7 and a half. You find it by turning your rulebook on its side and slamming your head against it..." insaniak
MeanGreenStompa - The only chatbot I ever tried talking to insisted I take a stress pill and kept referring to me as Dave, despite my protestations.
insaniak "So, by 'serious question' you actually meant something entirely different? "
Frazzled[Mod] On Rule #1- No it literally means: be polite. If we wanted less work there would be no OT section.
Chowderhead - God no. If I said Pirates Honor, I would have had to kill him whether he won or lost. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/11 14:40:17
Subject: Ridiculous argument on assaulting.
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
akira - uh, no. Read the rulebook errata on that one
You determine wh ocan hit move at the start of the assault, not the assault phase -so after assault moves and Pile in!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/11 16:31:02
Subject: Ridiculous argument on assaulting.
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
akira5665 wrote:And worse still, his Marines couldn't even hit back at the Genestealers till the next assault phase....
No, the Errata fixed that!
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/06/12 00:57:16
Subject: Ridiculous argument on assaulting.
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Hmm. I had a look in the rulebook 'Multiple assaults'- page 41. Me am Dumb. I had misread it all this time!
|
"Dakkanaut" not "Dakkaite"
Only with Minatures, does size matter...
"Only the living collect a pension"Johannes VII
"If the ork codex and 5th were developed near the same time, any possible nerf will be pre-planned."-malfred
"I'd do it but the GW Website makes my eyes hurt. "Gwar
"That would be page 7 and a half. You find it by turning your rulebook on its side and slamming your head against it..." insaniak
MeanGreenStompa - The only chatbot I ever tried talking to insisted I take a stress pill and kept referring to me as Dave, despite my protestations.
insaniak "So, by 'serious question' you actually meant something entirely different? "
Frazzled[Mod] On Rule #1- No it literally means: be polite. If we wanted less work there would be no OT section.
Chowderhead - God no. If I said Pirates Honor, I would have had to kill him whether he won or lost. |
|
 |
 |
|