| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 04:31:31
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Banelord Titan Princeps of Khorne
|
And once again, god forbid you have a negative opinion of something around here!
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 05:09:25
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
I can see Deadly's point the differance between production models and studio models is pretty big. Parts are missing (lower jaw of wrench), parts are changed (Shoulders, Jaws and Faces.) For the price per model cost these are some very disapointing fig's. Bland and not enough going on on the model as a whole to make me want to drop any amount of money on these things. With them coming pre-painted, made of rubber like material and having very little to draw apon for conversion and customization possibilities they are going to have to step it up a bit and make some better production models. Cause these ones are poorly done.
|
Current 2500 points Blood Angels 2000 points All Foot Troop IG 2000 points Terminator force (currently Imperial Fist) Old Armies 3000 points of Eldar 3000 points of CSM (Deathguard) 2000 points of CSM (Thousand Sons)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 05:11:01
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Trustworthy Shas'vre
|
Eh..... some people do not deem it worth to read ANY part of this thread and i have no intention of redaing for them so: RTFWT!
|
André Winter L'Art Noir - Game Design and Translation Studio |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 05:17:21
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills
|
Sadistikk- Is Duncan Idaho writing in magical letters that I can see and you can?t, or did you miss the part where he explained all of those issues?
The parts that appear to be missing are there- just obscured by JPG compression. The head positioning is slightly different because the heads are removable, and the necks aren?t pushed all the way in on the production models.
Whitedragon, all kinds of opinions, positive and negative, get jumped on around here. 5deadly just happened to rip a new one out of a completely undeserved target. No wonder he caught it harder than most.
|
Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.
Maelstrom's Edge! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 05:28:38
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
No i have actualy looked at the models in photoshop and tried to find the missing or changed details. Jpeg compression should not completly remove parts of a model just blur it and make it harder to spot not removed from the model. Removable heads does not make the facial details disappear. Or shoulders to look like they have been resculpted. all of Duncans *explanations* fail just on a pure technical standpoint. The models are changed not sure if its from using a rubber product and removing it to soon so the details fade or look like they have had a blur tool rubbered over them. the porduction models are just plain differant and ill take some screens of this convo so when we can hold models in our hands we can compare the studio models to the ones you have in hand and see. I think duncan and the rest of the fanboys will be saying "damn they was right these models are diff" just probly not man(or woman enough) to say it in front of everyone. Sorry if me or Deadly pointing out those changes and differances has wiped the fanboys into a frenzy of defence for thse models but a picture is worth a 1000 words and try as you might to defend these models the pics dont lie.
|
Current 2500 points Blood Angels 2000 points All Foot Troop IG 2000 points Terminator force (currently Imperial Fist) Old Armies 3000 points of Eldar 3000 points of CSM (Deathguard) 2000 points of CSM (Thousand Sons)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 05:40:48
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
Yeah, tak that fanboi! Not man enuff! I win the internetz!!11!!1opajdioas
Seriously, Sadstick, no need to make it personal. Maybe he actually *likes* the models! *gasp*horror*
|
-James
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 05:52:05
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Foul Dwimmerlaik
|
Using the nomer of fanboy is sure to inspire good will. Afterall everyone loves stereotypes. You may find it hard to get good responses to your posts if you continue to provoke. But then again, it appears you dont want mature responses, it appears you just want to argue over pedantic points. I really dont care if the models are slightly different than the studio models. Thats why they say "Production" and "studio". Two different things. Hardly misrepresented. If the general populace dont like them, then the game will fail. If they do like it and find it acceptable, then no one will have to worry. I am not sure what will make everyone happy, as it is early in the games infancy to tell. PS. Why is this thread still even open? 5deadly had to conscript help from under the bridge to make his point for him? Not really news or rumours that 5deadly and his buddy who eats "three billy goats gruff" dont like them. I think Triggerbaby's idea of making a new section of the forum is needed. We can call it the "Dumpster".
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 06:33:07
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
So my point is some how Invalid and I'm being nice so what attitude? hahaha you'll see the complaints pour in soon. but this is an old horse. better than mongoose but still not worth 6 buck each...Not To Me. Deadly You're completely nickpicking. Jaw sunken into the collar? HELLO, have you seen the marines? THats almost standard....especially with mark 8 armor....
|
Hope more old fools come to their senses and start giving you their money instead of those Union Jack Blood suckers... |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 06:33:20
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
Portland, OR
|
Of course, some of those details that are "missing" could mean the difference between an amazing studio paintjob and their basic factory paintjob. A good (thus, studio) artist can pull out details that would otherwise be obscured by a basic paintjob. It's not really that hard of a concept, I've several times looked at professional paintjobs of GW/Rackham models and said "Hey, I never saw that detail before!" on those same models that I painted myself.
|
"The convoluted wording of legalisms grew up around the necessity to hide from ourselves the violence we intend toward each other. Between depriving a man of one hour from his life and depriving him of his life there exists only a difference of degree. You have done violence to him, consumed his energy. Elaborate euphemisms may conceal your intent to kill, but behind any use of power over another the ultimate assumption remains: 'I feed on your energy.'" - Frank Herbert |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 06:45:51
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Trustworthy Shas'vre
|
Ok, I give up 5 is right and I am wrong..... only problem.... I already have seen the minis in flesh.
|
André Winter L'Art Noir - Game Design and Translation Studio |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 07:24:01
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Mimetic Bagh-Mari
|
Man people Really do take their miniatures seriously! Oh my. I complain in a very open, Negitive and hard way and you would think the way the words start flyin’ that I was talking about Race or Religion…I mean look at this I’m stating an opinion, not once attacking any dakka members or really direct my comments toward any one, just stating how I feel about a product. Then this happens Hellfury: “Really, IMO the rant wasnt neccesary. Most people I know cant touch how good those models are themselves.” So you can post how you feel but when a conflicting opinion to your own is posted it’s invalid right hellfury? “I really dont care if the models are slightly different than the studio models.” And I expect the Highest quality of model at 6 bucks a Pop if you don’t then, Fish on Amigo. “PS. Why is this thread still even open? 5deadly had to conscript help from under the bridge to make his point for him? Not really news or rumours that 5deadly and his buddy who eats "three billy goats gruff" dont like them.” Then you post about conscripts and Goats…Lame dude… Caern: “that was a pretty needless rant. I smell hyperbole. It may have crawled into something and died there.” – Same reply as to hellfury, and whats with the personal insult…I’m speaking on AT-43 not You. “The wrench jaw? It's still there.” No it’s not. NAVARRO: “so i keep the rest of my comments about AT43 for another less smelly thread.” Then do so… but you… “let me guess... GW board infants starting to appear? Sorry but cant waste my time repeating what have been said over and over again... this thread is getting way slowed... well with a kick start like that what to espect...” go on to Disrespect me personally Again…this is called trolling. So you like it, I don’t. Don’t attack me man. That some real B.S. To Duncan_Idaho you page is super awesome man it’s had the most up to date stuff on this…I ask for model owners to reply and you did, thanks for the input. I hope to have these in my local shop soon. if I’m wrong that’s the best part…I’ve been waiting for rackhams Sci-Fi games since the first “Dust” rumors hit French pages. Really if The Overseer have a nose I’ll buy it, hands down he rocks. And I plan to keep up on future post on your page…wish you had an English version. Once again thanks for your input. WhiteDragon Said it best: “And once again, god forbid you have a negative opinion of something around here!” I’m done, the trolling is too much. Trolls win, grumpy opinion looses. I’ll have to see the models.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 07:55:58
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Trustworthy Shas'vre
|
I like a good argument.... but I also like good informed oponents even more.
|
André Winter L'Art Noir - Game Design and Translation Studio |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 09:22:58
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
well let see the corse of events my first post "I can see Deadly's point the differance between production models and studio models is pretty big. Parts are missing (lower jaw of wrench), parts are changed (Shoulders, Jaws and Faces.) For the price per model cost these are some very disapointing fig's. Bland and not enough going on on the model as a whole to make me want to drop any amount of money on these things. With them coming pre-painted, made of rubber like material and having very little to draw apon for conversion and customization possibilities they are going to have to step it up a bit and make some better production models. Cause these ones are poorly done." notice how it state my oppion and not one personal attack on anyone this was followed by Duncan with "Eh..... some people do not deem it worth to read ANY part of this thread and i have no intention of redaing for them so: RTFWT!" then Mannahnin with "Sadistikk- Is Duncan Idaho writing in magical letters that I can see and you can’t, or did you miss the part where he explained all of those issues? The parts that appear to be missing are there- just obscured by JPG compression. The head positioning is slightly different because the heads are removable, and the necks aren’t pushed all the way in on the production models. Whitedragon, all kinds of opinions, positive and negative, get jumped on around here. 5deadly just happened to rip a new one out of a completely undeserved target. No wonder he caught it harder than most." wow such nice way to responsed to honest critasism of some model that left me disapointed. so i state my oppion about some models and get attacked. Ya of coarse after getting attacked im going to come back and defend myself and my views ....kinda the reason for a forums so some folks can get together and talk about the topic of the forums. If you dont like my view then dispute it but dont atk me on a personal lvl. Kinda childish. Ya i came back and threw out the fanboi's tag cause its seemed like i was dealing with a couple of fanboi's.
|
Current 2500 points Blood Angels 2000 points All Foot Troop IG 2000 points Terminator force (currently Imperial Fist) Old Armies 3000 points of Eldar 3000 points of CSM (Deathguard) 2000 points of CSM (Thousand Sons)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 09:34:54
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
“The wrench jaw? It's still there.” No it’s not.
Yeah, it is. You actually pointed it out when you drew the red rectangle around it. If you would just take two seconds to really *look* at the picture you would see it is simply a colour that blends into the coat behind, and because of the .jpg compression it is hard to see. JPG does not make things generic 'blurry', as has been previously stated.. The JPG compression algorithm looks for areas of similar colour ranges and merges them. The higher you set the compression, the wider the threshold between colours it is going to look for when merging. That is why the wrench is hard to see and why the top of the icon just dissapears into the background.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 09:40:27
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Webway
|
Did anyone notice the reply where Duncan stated that he saw the models himself?
I have no reason not to trust him. Anyway, when those miniatures get released everyone will be able to judge their paint and detail quality in person. For me, they're way above what I am accustomed to encounter in local games.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 12:53:53
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
SF Bay Area, CA
|
Speaking of painting, TTGN has an article on repainting AT-43 minis http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/?p=5659#more-5659
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 13:14:02
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Canada
|
|
"Nothing from the outside world can be imported into Canada without first being doused in ranch dressing. Canadian Techs have found that while this makes the internet delicious it tends to hamper the bandwidth potential. Scientists are working furiously to rectify the problem. "
--Glaive Company CO |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 14:48:56
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Jinking Ravenwing Land Speeder Pilot
In your house, rummaging through your underwear drawer
|
I second that emotion, Drake.
|
"Seriousness is the only refuge of the shallow"~Oscar Wilde |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/29 17:18:14
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
Banelord Titan Princeps of Khorne
|
Uh...can't Drake just make it stop if he wants too?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2007/01/30 01:28:16
Subject: RE: the new ?studio & production? shots for AT-43
|
 |
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
I think this thread has about covered all the bases of the topic and I'm going to lock it before it gets any more nasty than it already has.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|