Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/03/07 23:48:46
Subject: Are anvils of doom a requirement for a successful dwarf army?
|
 |
Auspicious Aspiring Champion of Chaos
|
Alright, as Chaoslord has pointed out, we're pretty far off topic at this point. I think we can all at least agree that Stelek can beat the dwarf players at his FLGS. Whether that translates to 'all dwarfs suck and are boring' is up for debate.
From what I see over at the brewery, successful lists tend towards anvil lists, gunlines, or hordes, with some interesting stubborn squeeze builds.
The stubborn squeeze involves Strollaz, hammerers, the Rune of Kingship and miners coming in from the back. Dash in enough shooting to protect yourself and it's a pretty interesting (and reportedly high performing list).
If you want some examples of all of these, come on over to the brewery (same as that GT report) and check it out.
RZ
|
“It was in lands of the Chi-An where she finally ran him to ground. There she kissed him deeply as he lay dying, and so stole from him his last, agonized breath.
On a delicate chain at her throat, she keeps it with her to this day.”
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/03/08 02:38:41
Subject: Are anvils of doom a requirement for a successful dwarf army?
|
 |
Mighty Chosen Warrior of Chaos
|
Last pinch of OT: Ahh, Red_Zeke, the voice of reason. I also second the suggestion of Stelek bringing us batrep of his lizzies vs dwarves.
|
...silence |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/03/08 03:43:18
Subject: Are anvils of doom a requirement for a successful dwarf army?
|
 |
Elusive Dryad
|
Hey Red,
Yeah, I've posted a couple of lists over at the brewery (as well as this exact topic...) but I wanted to try and snag as much advice as I could get. The horde sounds like an interesting approach, although, I'm hesitant to convert/paint 150 chaos dwarves.
Over at Bugman's they have this notion that a horde has to be 140 or more models. Is this a consensus? Cypher, you hit upon this idea as well, but looking at your list of nasties, it seems like it would be hard to keep all of that under 2000 points. While directed at cypher, this really applies to anyone with horde/non-anvil experience.
cheers
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/03/08 04:34:56
Subject: Are anvils of doom a requirement for a successful dwarf army?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
.................................... Searching for Iscandar
|
Well I'll see if my buddy wants to play a game tomorrow.
I'll even take pictures if he does.
I'm sure I'll finally lose. lol
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/03/08 12:56:58
Subject: Are anvils of doom a requirement for a successful dwarf army?
|
 |
Auspicious Aspiring Champion of Chaos
|
Sorry I didn't notice it there ether- I've been trying to cut down on my internet time lately.
As far as whether or not 140+ is consensus... that's not necessarily true. It definitely helps to go all out, but as you try to build your numbers up that high, you could stop along the way and test some alternate builds.
I'm thinking the data on successful horde dwarf lists is more limited- certainly you see more gunlines and anvil lists because if nothing else it's (as you've pointed out) a bit of a bummer to paint that many.
And a final note: How did I miss that this was for Chaos dwarfs?! Is this some kind of Dawi Zharr trick?!
RZ
|
“It was in lands of the Chi-An where she finally ran him to ground. There she kissed him deeply as he lay dying, and so stole from him his last, agonized breath.
On a delicate chain at her throat, she keeps it with her to this day.”
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/03/09 03:40:17
Subject: Are anvils of doom a requirement for a successful dwarf army?
|
 |
Krazed Killa Kan
|
I'm interested in the Horde of Dwarfs idea. I could field upwards of 4-5 Blocks, but I never seem to be able to fit in enough, especially at 2k.
Currently I'm looking for a way to squeeze in almost nothing but combat blocks, a Lord on Shield Bearers, and a Strollaz BSB. I figure a Cannon and 2 S7 BT's would be more than enough for shooting that I'd need to handle monsters I can't kill in CC.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/03/09 03:50:53
Subject: Are anvils of doom a requirement for a successful dwarf army?
|
 |
Elusive Dryad
|
The other option that came to me was the 3 hammerer block and miner/ranger support with a lord and strollaz BSB. This may be more powerful with the anvil, but the stubborn infantry always is nice.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/03/21 03:27:19
Subject: Are anvils of doom a requirement for a successful dwarf army?
|
 |
Stubborn Dark Angels Veteran Sergeant
Ontario
|
hey Stelek, would you mind actually posting one post at a time? Multiple posting is for retards....
(and you do it an awful lot)
|
DCDA:90-S++G+++MB++I+Pw40k98-D+++A+++/areWD007R++T(S)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/03/21 12:33:24
Subject: Are anvils of doom a requirement for a successful dwarf army?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Actually, he posted more posts after eachother because he was working on a response and while he posted someone else beat him to it, so he needed to make a second post for the latter's querry.
But back on topic: did you make a report already, since I'm really curious after how the list takes down dwarfs with so much ease.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/03/21 15:37:18
Subject: Are anvils of doom a requirement for a successful dwarf army?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
iowa
|
i agree with Stelek in that dwarves are pretty weak in my area as well. O&G or dwarves are usually regarded as an easy win in our local tournaments. but that may be a combination of weak book + newbie players. a lot of newbies buy Battle for Skull Pass and split models with their friends. sadly both players get stuck with crappy army books.
at the last tournament in my area i played my all goblin army as a goof and still managed to beat the most seasoned dwarf player in our area as my only win of the day.
|
When I'm in power, here's how I'm gonna put the country back on its feet. I'm going to put sterilizing agents in the following products: Sunny Delight, Mountain Dew, and Thick-Crust Pizza. Only the 'tardiest of the 'tards like the thick crust. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/03/23 01:11:39
Subject: Are anvils of doom a requirement for a successful dwarf army?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Around here Thorek...err, I mean Dwarves, are very competitive. Gunline/Anvil lists mostly. I saw one marching dwarf army, but they sort of got stomped.
|
All in all, fact is that Warhammer 40K has never been as balanced as it is now, and codex releases have never been as interesting as they are now (new units and vehicles and tons of new special rules/strategies each release -- not just the same old crap with a few changes in statlines and points costs).
-Therion
_______________________________________
New Codexia's Finest Hour - my fluff about the change between codexes, roughly novel length. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/03/24 05:53:35
Subject: Are anvils of doom a requirement for a successful dwarf army?
|
 |
Stubborn Dark Angels Veteran Sergeant
Ontario
|
The problem with dwarves is getting enough ladz to make em count...
Less toys more boyz. Words to live by.
|
DCDA:90-S++G+++MB++I+Pw40k98-D+++A+++/areWD007R++T(S)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
|