Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Necromunda suffered from the same problems that all other GW specalist games do; It was a really good core game but then they just kept tacking on way to much stuff, expansion after expansion until it stresses and breaks the original rules set so they try to slap a patch on the rules with a slightly more "updated" version, then the whole game is shelved. The weak campaign/ league systems seams to be a hallmark of specialist games as well.

What about =][=munda?

At our local club we tend to play more one off Necromunda games, just do a gang up for the usual starting creds following the normal gang design rules and play.
I've been playing Necro since it first came out (have 6 painted gangs with another two still to go...) and have never had a bad game of it, win or lose...
Mick