Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I'm fine with rolling for it. If it keeps popping up, I just roll again. You're right though, really fething bad FAQ's....

I completely agree that many of the rules problems are people seeking advantage where none is to be had.

That said, I have two big problems with GW's rules: Firstly, that they very rarely define terms properly and sometimes use them ambiguously. Secondly, that they mix rules, explanation and fluff with no clear distinction.

Actually, they are 99% pretty good at separating "fluff" in one paragraph, with the rules worthy part in the last paragraphs under a rule. The stuff preceding it is usually to give you context, reason, and intent in an entertaining way to read. Though it can be confusing.

sourclams wrote:My game store has agreed to using John Spencer rulings.

That's what my group has done. We found very little we disagreed with and add to it when needed by hosting a poll on our community site.