Switch Theme:

Failed Save =/ Unsaved wound re: exsanguinator  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Infiltrating Oniwaban





Fayetteville

LOL. Subtle.

Was this ever an issue in 4th edition when the SM narthecium had basically the same rules (minus the reductor part) as the current exsanguinator?

The Imperial Navy, A Galatic Force for Good. 
   
Made in jp
Regular Dakkanaut




(AB, I stand to be corrected, but I seem to recall it being was FAQed to say unsaved=failed or something similar in 4th ed. )

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/07/09 07:30:43


 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut







Morticon,
I would imagine that a more prompt and direct response would result if you were to send a PM to yakface or one of the other parties on the Adepticon FAQ council, rather than posting your message on the forum and expecting the forum members to reconstruct the reasoning process involved.
   
Made in jp
Regular Dakkanaut




Roger that!!

Thank you for the tip.

I thought they might peruse the forums, didnt know they were this aloof.
I also didnt want to seem like I was getting into a debate with them on one issue- which im sure loads of people do.

Must be tiring.
Anyway, i'll explore that avenue. Thanks again.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: