Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I was actually doing that to illustrate the point as to what the lack of a simple letter could do... so in that sense I think I supported your subtle joke

Afrikan Blonde wrote:The results of the poll are telling. Phil has written many good codices. It looks like a simple mistake to me and I would never go so far as to try capitalizing on it in the of RaW. Still it's very interesting to hear what the RaW advocates have to say about it.

If you really wanted the 'RAW crowd' to voice their RAW opinions then you should probably not have asked what we 'think' GW meant by the rule but rather how we feel the rule reads as written.

As is I'm voting for what I 'think' they meant, not how I feel the rule currently reads. I will second the call for an Errata fix on it though.

Thor665 wrote:

Afrikan Blonde wrote:The results of the poll are telling. Phil has written many good codices. It looks like a simple mistake to me and I would never go so far as to try capitalizing on it in the of RaW. Still it's very interesting to hear what the RaW advocates have to say about it.

If you really wanted the 'RAW crowd' to voice their RAW opinions then you should probably not have asked what we 'think' GW meant by the rule but rather how we feel the rule reads as written.

As is I'm voting for what I 'think' they meant, not how I feel the rule currently reads. I will second the call for an Errata fix on it though.

Or how about an incredibly comprehensive FAQ? </Shameless Plug>