Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Gwar! wrote:

thebetter1 wrote:I'm still waiting for someone to show how the "one unit" must be the one that destroyed the vehicle. Nobody has shown a real link; it has just been everybody's opinion.

Hows this for a link:

ITS A RULE ABOUT ASSAULTING A UNIT THAT DISEMBARKED FROM A TRANSPORT WITH THE UNIT THAT DESTROYED THE TRANSPORT!

No it's not. This is what we've been debating this whole time, so stating it as a fact in all caps does not make you right.

don_mondo wrote:
We don't need a link, all we need is the rulebook..........................

Yes, and it helps to actually use the rulebook rather than just calling on its name when you can't think of a real argument.

Yup, I think we're about done here.

To reiterate the important points: The rule is interpreted a couple of different ways. Your best bet is to discuss it with your opponent before the game.


Locking before this goes any further south.