Switch Theme:

Republicans Vote To Repeal Obama-Backed Bill That Would Destroy Asteroid Headed For Earth  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Smokin' Skorcha Driver





Heh, reminds me of Robot Chicken when all the porn on the internet was wiped out.

 
   
Made in ca
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General






BWAHAHA I love The Onion. I honestly beleieve this is what the GOP would do if something like Obamastiod was enacted.

 
   
Made in us
The Hammer of Witches





A new day, a new time zone.

Although really, the whole point of the satire was that both sides were focusing as politics as usual and not the fact that a big asteroid was going to hit the earth, hence the phrasing, 'will affect more than 300 million Americans,' 'with a loss of up to 14 trillion $ of the GDP." Y'know, everyone in the country and the entire economy.

Also, how resolutely it focuses on just the U.S, since obviously the rest of the world has no reason to care about this particular issue.

"-Nonsense, the Inquisitor and his retinue are our hounoured guests, of course we should invite them to celebrate Four-armed Emperor-day with us..."
Thought for the Day - Never use the powerfist hand to wipe. 
   
Made in au
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak





Bookwrack wrote:Although really, the whole point of the satire was that both sides were focusing as politics as usual and not the fact that a big asteroid was going to hit the earth


Yeah, definitely. For the record, you just said perfectly in one sentence what I said fair less clearly in a couple of paragraphs.

hence the phrasing, 'will affect more than 300 million Americans,' 'with a loss of up to 14 trillion $ of the GDP." Y'know, everyone in the country and the entire economy.


$14 trillion would be the whole of the economy.

“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”

Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. 
   
Made in us
The Hammer of Witches





A new day, a new time zone.

Right, because it doesn't exist anymore, because the asteroid wiped out all life on Earth (that was the other funny thing, how everything was focused on the US, as if Armageddon Mrk XII was soley a national problem).

"-Nonsense, the Inquisitor and his retinue are our hounoured guests, of course we should invite them to celebrate Four-armed Emperor-day with us..."
Thought for the Day - Never use the powerfist hand to wipe. 
   
Made in au
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak





Bookwrack wrote:Right, because it doesn't exist anymore, because the asteroid wiped out all life on Earth (that was the other funny thing, how everything was focused on the US, as if Armageddon Mrk XII was soley a national problem).


Yeah, referring to the economic impact in the relatively sterile term of a $14 trillion loss, when it'd be $14 trillion - $14 trillion = $0, or the complete destruction of the US economy.

And yeah, talking about the issue in totally American terms was gold.

“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”

Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. 
   
 
Forum Index » Off-Topic Forum
Go to: