Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Kilkrazy wrote:White Dwarf isn't a magazine in the generally understood sense.

It's advertising and should be held to advertising not journalistic standards.

Exactly, to avoid paying more in postage, they claim it is a cataloug, not a magazine. They should be held to those standards.

I thought you were joking Skyth, but it seems that is the case

So GW admit that WD is a catalogue
Now they just need to admit it scandalous to charge customers nearly a fiver a month for their advertising.

/cynicism

DaemonJellybaby wrote:Just looked at CH's Five Heresy Era JPs
http://chapterhousestudios.com/webshop/component/virtuemart/?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypage.tpl&product_id=74&category_id=24

These look suspiciously similar to FW's Heresy Era JPs

Think what you will...

Which came first?

The chicken or the egg?

Because CH was producing them for a long time while GW/FW did not until the recent court case began.

Is it bad, that I am happy that something I sculpted ended up in White Dwarf?

I only wish they gave me credit...

I'm taking the view that if GW is mistakenly identifying third-party work as their own, then that only helps support their case that these accessories are trespassing on their IP and serves to confuse the consumer that they are using GW products.

I doubt very much that when the guy bought it he really thought it was a GW part