Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Imperial Guard and Orks atm.

When 6th turns up later in the year, I'll be adding a third from the box, hopefully Dark Angels. Otherwise who knows.

I just recently started collecting Tau. I've played Space Marines for a while.

Does it count if I recently started building a Space Marine army but I haven't yet gotten the chance to play it?

Currently playing my Chaos Daemons, also starting a Chaos Marine army which will be a themed 'daemonbomb' tactic and inbetween the chaotic goodness, I'm slowly starting up a Knights of Blood army. (renegade BA successor chapter)

Apparently I really like chaos, maybe next year I should add Dark Angels as my 4th chaos army?!

Surprisingly balanced so far.

MEQ claim a staggering 47% of the whole, though only vanilla, Chaos and BA number above average.
I'm tempted to say the age of a codex isn't a relevant factor -at least not the most relevant- , seeing as Chaos and Eldar stand tall among the more recent books. The "competitive power level" doesn't seem to have any significance either ; IG and BA are doing well (that is to say above average), but we're way past the leafblower season and the BA have since been out-Warded.
Tau and SoB as far as I know have always been somewhat "niche" armies, and I suspect the old codices aren't helping either.

Open to discussion of course ! In fact, that's the point

In the Name of the Emperor kinda glad there is not alot of templar players, we'll see how that stays when they get a new codex(say hellow to the band wagon for oh so many people)

Bandwagon seems kinda not really the cae considering on the poll the newer dexes have fewer players then older.

Praised be the Emeror indeed. But i pray that SoB will get better, for only His watching eyes and power of will keep my dice rolling good for faith.
On the next editions: well, the future is clouded as to will Eldar be a competitive dex.
The screams of thousands hail that the Dark Eldar are performing as predicted and send their donations to Archon Vect on time.

On the inquisition: sisters of battle are under the command of the Eclesiarchy, they are equiped with weapons to kill witches, but the real hunters now are the grey knights as said above. But then comes the question: by useing pure inquisition, what did thou use for thine elite and fast slots? As my memory serves, those were the Sisters of Battle.

I play Eldar, Necrons and Tyranids.

Been focusing on my Crons for the most part lately, and having a blast!

Right now, only Tyranids. I don't have enough, painted or otherwise, to consider starting a new army yet. I'd want to get them to roughly 3000 points, all painted before I even considered it.

Cain wrote:In the Name of the Emperor kinda glad there is not alot of templar players, we'll see how that stays when they get a new codex(say hellow to the band wagon for oh so many people)

When I was deciding which army to start playing 40K with, I really wanted to run the Templars, but then I heard there could be a new codex for them soon and decided it might not be the best time to start them.

Ah, Orks and Guard are level peging as always
*at time of this post;
Imperial Guard 9% [ 36 ]
Orks 9% [ 36 ]
There are always as many of them green skins as us!

Black Templars, Necrons