Switch Theme:

Republican VS Railroads  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in jp
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer






Somewhere in south-central England.

http://www.trainweb.org/moksrail/advocacy/resources/subsidies/transport.htm

I'm writing a load of fiction. My latest story starts here... This is the index of all the stories...

We're not very big on official rules. Rules lead to people looking for loopholes. What's here is about it. 
   
Made in us
Hangin' with Gork & Mork






Atlas Shrugged was about the government and railroads. One of the great fantasy novels, except for the turgid writing and poor pacing, of course.

Amidst the mists and coldest frosts he thrusts his fists against the posts and still insists he sees the ghosts.
 
   
Made in us
Dwarf High King with New Book of Grudges




United States

biccat wrote:
But Amtrak has competition, we see it every day. People choose to drive or fly rather than use Amtrak's service, for a variety of reasons. Obviously, when given a choice, people don't prefer Amtrak, and it's reflected in its lack of profitability.

In short: Amtrak is a service that we have to be compelled to support because it is unable to succeed in the market.


On a passenger-mile basis Amtrak is subsidized at roughly the same level as air travel.

Automotive travel is subsidized significantly less, but is still subsidized via the construction and maintenance of roads.

Arguably, Amtrak could simply be broken up, with the state taking on a role similar to the one its hold regarding automotive travel. That is, the government maintains the tracks, and establishes transit standards, but private entities incur the financial risk by operating the actual trains.

Life does not cease to be funny when people die any more than it ceases to be serious when people laugh. 
   
Made in th
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot






biccat wrote:
purplefood wrote:The plane people hate the train people and the government are helping the plane people beat the train people...
/conspiricy

You've got it backwards. It's the train people who are getting their preferred mode of transportation subsidized at the expense of the rest of us.

I wouldn't have any problem with trains (I still wouldn't use them) if passengers paid their 'fair share.'


yes. i'm favoring railroad reforms. Amtrak is a quasi USRA II, those railroad companies are now operates its lines on revenue. and they should be allowed to invest on Euro-style HST instead.


This kitty is waitin'!

=^.^=



http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/408342.page 
   
Made in jp
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer






Somewhere in south-central England.

Amtrak's freight operations should not be ignored. They are a huge freight carrier.

I'm writing a load of fiction. My latest story starts here... This is the index of all the stories...

We're not very big on official rules. Rules lead to people looking for loopholes. What's here is about it. 
   
 
Forum Index » Off-Topic Forum
Go to: