Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/22 21:37:55
Subject: What are the most/least useful battleforces?
|
 |
Possessed Khorne Marine Covered in Spikes
|
Just bought the Chaos Daemons boxset. It's quite a high model count (45). Good as an army expansion, but wouldn't call it even close to a 'good to go' force by any means.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/23 00:22:47
Subject: What are the most/least useful battleforces?
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
Joey wrote:Cerebrium wrote:Imperial Guard one is good too. It's a basic platoon plus a sentinel straight out the box. Or if you make the regular guardsmen into veterans, it's a potential 500 point army in a box.
It works out as basically getting a free Sentinal. Woopdie doo.
It used to have a Russ instead...
I would buy it if it had a Demolisher, or maybe a regular Russ kit instead of a sentinel.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/23 06:47:56
Subject: What are the most/least useful battleforces?
|
 |
Unhealthy Competition With Other Legions
York, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom
|
But that would put the price up!!
|
Imperial guard: Because quantity has a quality of it's own.
Sisters of Battle can be used in any game, with the exception of chess, Monopoly and of course, Warhammer 40,000.
After 8 editions, you might have thought that GW could get fantasy right. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/23 14:26:53
Subject: Re:What are the most/least useful battleforces?
|
 |
Ship's Officer
|
I really love the Sisters of Battle Battleforce.
2 squads of 10 sisters, A Cannoness, an Immolator and 5 Seraphim all for $100!
I just wish it wasn't all in my head...
DoW
|
"War. War never changes." - Fallout
4000pts
3000pts
1000pts
2500pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/23 15:04:17
Subject: What are the most/least useful battleforces?
|
 |
Sure Space Wolves Land Raider Pilot
|
Space Wolves is decent. 20 Blood Claws/Grey Hunters/Wolf Guard, heck with the bits and some creativity you could even kitbash and make a Rune Priest. I love the Wolf Scouts because they can come in on any board edge, but the Drop Pod is a waste IMO. I purchased my Battleforce almost a year ago and the drop pod is still in the box on the sprue.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/23 16:44:54
Subject: What are the most/least useful battleforces?
|
 |
Bounding Assault Marine
|
I am going to say SM battleforce as another good deal.
Price wise its absolutlely great. Here in my store 1 assault squad box is Php1500,Scouts are 1300,rhino is 1500, Tac squad 1700, combat squad 1300. But the battle force is Php 4500 (around $100, cheaper in my country). Heck you can make a captain with the contents of the box.
Tactically, scouts suck (these variants),Assault squad is the same thing, Combat squad is nearly useless but I did make mine sternguard. Rhino is good but more would rather have a Razorback.
Just my 2 cents
|
1850 points (buying new stuff)
Canceled, waiting for new dex
A battleforce, some guardians, a DA box, 2 banshee boxes,1 warp spider box,2 swooping hawk boxes, Found new love for the guys, debating on whether i should start or not |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/23 16:50:55
Subject: Re:What are the most/least useful battleforces?
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
DogOfWar wrote:I really love the Sisters of Battle Battleforce.
2 squads of 10 sisters, A Cannoness, an Immolator and 5 Seraphim all for $100!
I just wish it wasn't all in my head...
DoW 
I'll bet it's plastic too
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/23 17:13:24
Subject: Re:What are the most/least useful battleforces?
|
 |
Ship's Officer
|
Grey Templar wrote:DogOfWar wrote:I really love the Sisters of Battle Battleforce.
2 squads of 10 sisters, A Cannoness, an Immolator and 5 Seraphim all for $100!
I just wish it wasn't all in my head...
DoW 
I'll bet it's plastic too 
Of course.
And it comes with two full sprues of bitz for extra customization!
DoW
|
"War. War never changes." - Fallout
4000pts
3000pts
1000pts
2500pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/23 19:55:07
Subject: Re:What are the most/least useful battleforces?
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
Hatfield, PA
|
NuclearMessiah wrote:I do agree with the Black Reach thing, I am going to buy up as many of the plastic Deffkoptas as I can and a few of the warbosses before they are OOP with 6th.
I am in process of buying 3 sets of the AoBR orks from a friend for $60...can't beat that for 60 boys, 15 nobz, 9 deff coptas and 3 warboss figs.
I would have bought a couple of the battleforces, but I like the idea of having a couple mad hordes of screaming copters instead of mad hordes of screamer bikers...
Skriker
|
CSM 6k points CSM 4k points
CSM 4.5k points CSM 3.5k points
 and Daemons 4k points each
Renegades 4k points
SM 4k points
SM 2.5k Points
3K 2.3k
EW, MW and LW British in Flames of War |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/24 11:33:16
Subject: What are the most/least useful battleforces?
|
 |
[DCM]
Moustache-twirling Princeps
Gone-to-ground in the craters of Coventry
|
Until I got my 3rd Eldar battleforce, whenever I wanted a Wave Serpent or War Walker, I would consider getting another box. The Guardians will get turned into Storm Guardians eventually, but I use a lot of Dire Avengers.
So, for me, the Eldar BF is great, but 3 is the most I'll buy.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/26 01:38:48
Subject: Re:What are the most/least useful battleforces?
|
 |
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
Ye Olde North State
|
I second the post on the crappy-ness of the ork battleforce, which is really a shame considering the rest of the model line is fantastic (Warbuggies? What? Never heard of them, sorry). You get 3 bikers, a trukk and 20 boyz. What do they expect you to do with the 20 boyz and the trukk? Any ork worth his teef fills trukks to the brim, but that's just 8 boyz left over. But who wants to slog ten boyz? Also, most trukk lists don't have enough time for bikers, but whatever. Probably we will get a nice one after black reach goes oop.
|
grendel083 wrote:"Dis is Oddboy to BigBird, come in over."
"BigBird 'ere, go ahead, over."
"WAAAAAAAAAGGGHHHH!!!! over"
"Copy 'dat, WAAAAAAAGGGHHH!!! DAKKADAKKA!!... over" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/05/26 14:44:45
Subject: What are the most/least useful battleforces?
|
 |
Sinewy Scourge
Lawrence, KS
|
In 3-4e the Necron box was the best buy there was. 20 warriors, 5 scarabs (more if you spread out the scarabs and got a few round bases) and 3 Destroyers. Two of those and you have a very solid Phalanx and 6 destroyers (who were just punishing in terms of volume of fire) Add in a Monolith and a Necron Lord or two and you're in business. Add in Immortals to round out the list to 1850. Very, very cheap.
The new one also appears quite solid. It gives you a choice on which vehicle you build out of the box rather than shoehorning you into a transport only, and many lists relying on redundancy to keep their arks alive.
|
Therion wrote:6th edition lands on June 23rd!
Good news. This is the best time in the hobby. Full of promise. GW lets us down each time and we know it but secretly we're hoping that this is the edition that GW gives us a balanced game that can also be played competitively at tournaments. I'm loving it.
|
|
 |
 |
|