Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 05:38:45
Subject: Re:Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
Mannahnin wrote:
Good catch!
Per the general Reserve rules, page 124, a dedicated transport and its unit count as 1, and ICs must be counted separately.
However per the more specific Deep Strike rules, page 36, a unit which always Deep Strikes does not count, nor do "any models embarked upon" it.
"Here that boys?!"
"Load'm up!"
<herds tactical squad back on to its drop pod>
Sad thing is I actually posted this awhile ago in a thread actually called "Drop Pods and Reserves" (close but not the same), and completely forgot it on the Challenge overflow furry
Lobukia wrote:
How about, No, read the rules... not only do the marines themselves not count towards the 50% not allowed to be in reserves, but any IC with them wouldn't count either, and IF you did need to round, you round up (as stated in the rules)
2 IC, 4 tacticals with 4DPs, = everyone in reserve
2 IC, 4 tacticals with 4Dps, +Assault Marine squad with jumps on = everyone in reserve
All Drop is a go in 6e
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2012/07/10 05:39:34
DO:70S++G++M+B++I+Pw40k93/f#++D++++A++++/eWD-R++++T(D)DM+
Note: Records since 2010, lists kept current (W-D-L) Blue DP Crusade 126-11-6 Biel-Tan Aspect Waves 2-0-2 Looted Green Horde smash your face in 32-7-8 Broadside/Shield Drone/Kroot blitz goodness 23-3-4 Grey Hunters galore 17-5-5 Khan Bikes Win 63-1-1 Tanith with Pardus Armor 11-0-0 Crimson Tide 59-4-0 Green/Raven/Deathwing 18-0-0 Jumping GK force with Inq. 4-0-0 BTemplars w LRs 7-1-2 IH Legion with Automata 8-0-0 RG Legion w Adepticon medal 6-0-0 Primaris and Little Buddies 7-0-0
QM Templates here, HH army builder app for both v1 and v2
One Page 40k Ruleset for Game Beginners |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 08:38:27
Subject: Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
Tough Tyrant Guard
|
The IC only get exempted from the 50% rule if the drop pod is their dedicated transport.
Jump marines are not exempt from the 50% rule because they aren't FORCED to start in reserve, like drop pods are. An Independent character always counts as 1 towards the half your army rule, unless they have their own dedicated transport that must start in reserve.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/10 08:42:22
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 10:49:41
Subject: Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
Blood Angel Neophyte Undergoing Surgeries
England
|
TraceofToxin, can you provide a page number for this? I can't seem to find it. Page 36 states "When working out how many units can be placed in reserve, units that must be deployed by Deep Strike (along with any models embarked upon them) are ignored. So an IC would not count and can be placed in a Drop Pod without issue.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/10 10:50:14
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 11:26:58
Subject: Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills
|
Traceoftoxin wrote:The IC only get exempted from the 50% rule if the drop pod is their dedicated transport.
Not correct. Check out page 36. If it's a transport which is forced to DS any models riding in it don't count toward the Reserve limit.
Traceoftoxin wrote:Jump marines are not exempt from the 50% rule because they aren't FORCED to start in reserve, like drop pods are.
Correct.
Traceoftoxin wrote:An Independent character always counts as 1 towards the half your army rule, unless they have their own dedicated transport that must start in reserve.
Not correct. You're mixing up two different rules on pages 124 and 36.
|
Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.
Maelstrom's Edge! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 12:16:47
Subject: Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
Tough Tyrant Guard
|
Mannahnin wrote:Traceoftoxin wrote:The IC only get exempted from the 50% rule if the drop pod is their dedicated transport.
Not correct. Check out page 36. If it's a transport which is forced to DS any models riding in it don't count toward the Reserve limit.
Traceoftoxin wrote:Jump marines are not exempt from the 50% rule because they aren't FORCED to start in reserve, like drop pods are.
Correct.
Traceoftoxin wrote:An Independent character always counts as 1 towards the half your army rule, unless they have their own dedicated transport that must start in reserve.
Not correct. You're mixing up two different rules on pages 124 and 36.
Pg. 124, "Independent Characters are also counted as a single unit regardless of whether they have joined another unit or not." Emphasis mine.
Pg. 36 is in reference to joining another unit, pg. 124 tells us that it's irrelevant if they join another unit, they always count.
[edit] I concede you are correct, sir. For some reason I had it in my mind that it said "...are also always...". Drop podding circumvents the restriction, however you cannot use something like fliers to achieve the same result.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/10 12:23:19
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 12:23:22
Subject: Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
Blood Angel Neophyte Undergoing Surgeries
England
|
Pg. 36 makes no mention of IC joining units. It merely states any units in a transport that must arrive via deep strike are not counted for the reserve total.
I think you should read page 36 and quote the ruling that supports your statement.
Edit: Ninja. You are correct on the flyer statement
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/07/10 12:25:58
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 15:02:17
Subject: Re:Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
Ferocious Blood Claw
|
Good catch on Pg 36, I didn't see this... that changes everything!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 15:02:58
Subject: Re:Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Reading this thread almost gave me a headache.
Anyone care to make a simple summary?
Can an army that looks like this all deepstrike?:
Example 1:
IC + tac + pod
tac + pod
tac + pod
tac + pod
Example 2:
IC + tac + pod
tac + pod
tac + pod
1 terminator squad
1 landspeeder
1 assault marine squad
Example 3:
IC + tac + pod
tac + pod
tac + pod
terminator squad
1 landspeeder
IC + assault marine squad
Example 4:
IC + tac + pod
IC + tac + pod
tac + pod
1 terminator squad
1 landspeeder
1 assault marine squad
|
Salamanders W-78 D-55 L-22
Pure Grey Knights W-18 D-10 L-5
Orks W-9 D-6 L-14
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 15:29:38
Subject: Re:Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control
|
Pyriel- wrote:Example 1:
IC + tac + pod
tac + pod
tac + pod
tac + pod
Yes. Since the IC is in the pod and falls under the "any passenger" rule this army list can all DS.
Example 2:
IC + tac + pod
tac + pod
tac + pod
1 terminator squad
1 landspeeder
1 assault marine squad
No. You have 3 units that may DS so you must deploy 1 of them (3/2=1.5 and you always round up so 2 may be in reserve).
Example 3:
IC + tac + pod
tac + pod
tac + pod
terminator squad
1 landspeeder
IC + assault marine squad
Also no. Since the IC is not in a transport that must DS the latter rules on 124 take over and he counts as 1 unit. So you have 4 units that can DS (assuming the IC has a jump pack, if not then he cannot DS and the assault marines must come in by normal reserves) half of them are 2 so only 2 units can DS. If you DS with the IC+AMS then the termies and land speeder must be deployed, etc...
Example 4:
IC + tac + pod
IC + tac + pod
tac + pod
1 terminator squad
1 landspeeder
1 assault marine squad
Same as example 3. Since both IC are in a pod they do not count, and you can keep 2 of the non-pods in reserve.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 15:29:39
Subject: Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
The Hive Mind
|
1: Yes. (everything is in a pod so must deploy from reserves)
2: No. (the 3 pods don't count, so there's 3 units -50% of 3 is 2 units can reserve)
3: No. (same as 2, except 4 units, 50% is 2)
4: No. (same as 2)
|
My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 15:48:42
Subject: Re:Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Ah, thanks Captain Antivas and rigeld2.
|
Salamanders W-78 D-55 L-22
Pure Grey Knights W-18 D-10 L-5
Orks W-9 D-6 L-14
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 15:53:32
Subject: Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
[DCM]
Dankhold Troggoth
|
Mannahnin wrote:Traceoftoxin wrote:The IC only get exempted from the 50% rule if the drop pod is their dedicated transport.
Not correct. Check out page 36. If it's a transport which is forced to DS any models riding in it don't count toward the Reserve limit.
Traceoftoxin wrote:Jump marines are not exempt from the 50% rule because they aren't FORCED to start in reserve, like drop pods are.
Correct.
Traceoftoxin wrote:An Independent character always counts as 1 towards the half your army rule, unless they have their own dedicated transport that must start in reserve.
Not correct. You're mixing up two different rules on pages 124 and 36.
Thanks for this, I didn't realize ICs in pods were exempted. Great!!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 16:09:19
Subject: Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control
|
RiTides wrote:Thanks for this, I didn't realize ICs in pods were exempted. Great!!
We all have to thank Tactica. He is the one who originally pointed it out. I just ran with it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 16:31:38
Subject: Re:Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
Paramount Plague Censer Bearer
|
Yea that page 36 bit "ANY MODELS EMBARKED IN THEM" really helps answere the question thanks all!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 16:54:05
Subject: Re:Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
Dooley wrote:Alright I have been playing drop pods for a while now (since 4th BEFORE you actually GOT PODS!) Here is how I figure it. Please forgive me for not being able to provide page #'s but I dont have my book with me!
You've been playing this long and still havcen't learned how to spell reserves?
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 17:40:43
Subject: Re:Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
The Hive Mind
|
Lordhat wrote:You've been playing this long and still havcen't learned how to spell reserves?
Irony, thy name is Lordhat. (psst, it's haven't)
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/07/10 17:40:50
My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 17:46:12
Subject: Re:Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
rigeld2 wrote:Lordhat wrote:You've been playing this long and still havcen't learned how to spell reserves?
Irony, thy name is Lordhat.
(psst, it's haven't)
That's actually more poetic than ironic
|
DO:70S++G++M+B++I+Pw40k93/f#++D++++A++++/eWD-R++++T(D)DM+
Note: Records since 2010, lists kept current (W-D-L) Blue DP Crusade 126-11-6 Biel-Tan Aspect Waves 2-0-2 Looted Green Horde smash your face in 32-7-8 Broadside/Shield Drone/Kroot blitz goodness 23-3-4 Grey Hunters galore 17-5-5 Khan Bikes Win 63-1-1 Tanith with Pardus Armor 11-0-0 Crimson Tide 59-4-0 Green/Raven/Deathwing 18-0-0 Jumping GK force with Inq. 4-0-0 BTemplars w LRs 7-1-2 IH Legion with Automata 8-0-0 RG Legion w Adepticon medal 6-0-0 Primaris and Little Buddies 7-0-0
QM Templates here, HH army builder app for both v1 and v2
One Page 40k Ruleset for Game Beginners |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 17:56:46
Subject: Re:Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
Paramount Plague Censer Bearer
|
What type of Irony would it be? Dramatic, Verbal or Situational? I would have to say Situational.
I was going to make the same observation but thanks for beating me to it. Something about Pots and Kettels comes to mind!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/10 19:42:47
Subject: Re:Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Pointing out spelling errors:
When you simply cannot find any real argument to bring up
|
Salamanders W-78 D-55 L-22
Pure Grey Knights W-18 D-10 L-5
Orks W-9 D-6 L-14
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/07/11 04:22:17
Subject: Re:Drop Pod and reserves (6th Ed)
|
 |
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
Lobukia wrote:rigeld2 wrote:Lordhat wrote:You've been playing this long and still havcen't learned how to spell reserves?
Irony, thy name is Lordhat.
(psst, it's haven't)
That's actually more poetic than ironic
LOL I'm an artist at heart. :-p
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
 |
 |
|