Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

The walker rules and vehicle basic rules are not exclusive to each other. In 6th edition you cannot tarpit a walker with infantry unable to hurt it, unless it charges into them. Period.

Yeah, I think until GW FAQs otherwise you aren't allowed to charge a Dread with Termagants.

I'm not sure if they intended it or not, but I think they need to FAQ it if they want it to happen.

The Termigants could be buffed with a Psychic power(Ironarm from Biomancy IIRC) to be able to at least glance it. Then you could charge in legally and tarpit it. you arn't required to use the "Our Weapons are Useless" rule so once you are in combat you can stay.

Grey Templar wrote:The Termigants could be buffed with a Psychic power(Ironarm from Biomancy IIRC) to be able to at least glance it. Then you could charge in legally and tarpit it. you arn't required to use the "Our Weapons are Useless" rule so once you are in combat you can stay.

If the termagaunts are in synapse they couldn't use OWAU even if you wanted to.

Grey Templar wrote:The Termigants could be buffed with a Psychic power(Ironarm from Biomancy IIRC) to be able to at least glance it. Then you could charge in legally and tarpit it. you arn't required to use the "Our Weapons are Useless" rule so once you are in combat you can stay.

Ironarm is Psyker-only.