Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 Lokas wrote:
Gather their tears of hatred in a goblet and drink deep of their impotent sorrow.

Well...Signatured.

I am really dreading when eldar get updated, the people in my gaming group already refer to me as 'the guy who plays eldar.'

 PhrycePhyre wrote:
I am really dreading when eldar get updated, the people in my gaming group already refer to me as 'the guy who plays eldar.'

Considering that Eldar were the GK of 4th, it's a bit of a surprise.

I've never had a problem with anyone playing Wolves, Eldar or Grey Knights. Most of the guys in my gaming group have been playing the same army since 3rd edition (one since 2nd).

There was a time I disliked playing Nids, but even my buddies list with Storm Wolves, MSU/razorbacks seems fine to me. He's more than earned the right to use whatever list he think is fun in my book, on account of the years that he stuck with wolves when they were clearly below par from other codex. I would be okay with anyone running the smae Wolf list he does.

The only thing I've really considered over powered was 2nd edition warp spiders. I played Eldar back then, but I never used warp spiders on principle. I saw one shot from a 2nd ed. warp spider take out a blood thirster, a genestealer patriarch, and Tyranid Warrior. That WAS harsh. But other than that most of the stuff these days is okay.