Bee's kill the HIV.

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**schadenfreude**

Useful, but not a cure for the hiv.

Best use would be for rape victims, but being applied after the fact effectiveness will drop.

They could probably add it to condom lube, but condoms work well as it is. Further improvements would be miniscule gains compared to what increased condom use would yield.

Realistically no condom sex in the vajayjay would rarely see the anti hiv formula being used. People will probably just follow their current patterns of using condoms or going raw dog. It could probably be added to sex lube, but I doubt it will be as effective as condoms so it runs the risk of encouraging people not to wear their helmet. There is also the pesky fact being on the catching end or oral with a man is about as high risk as anal. I just don't think an anti hiv cream or lube will yield very impressive results outside the lab.

**whembly**

'nother article:

Earlier this week we reported on the remarkable news that a Mississippi-born baby was cured of HIV. Now, as if to show the disease that its days are truly numbered, researchers from Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis have shown that nanoparticles infused with a toxic bee venom can kill HIV. The researchers hope to take this new compound and develop a vaginal gel that can prevent the further spread of the disease.

The key to this discovery, which was made by Samuel A. Wickline and his team at Washington University, involves cytolyic melittin peptides. Melittin is found in bee venom, and it has the fortuitous trait of being able to degrade the protective envelope that surrounds HIV.

For the experiment, Wickline's team prepared free melittin and melittin-loaded nanoparticles and set them against various strains of HIV (CXCR4 and CCR5 in particular). The researchers then showed that melittin, when delivered in these large and free accumulations, can make life miserable for the disease.

Moreover, these melittin-loaded nanoparticles left the surrounding cells unharmed, which bodes well for the development of a topical vaginal virucide. But this didn't happen by accident. The nanoparticles were endowed with a kind of filter that prevents healthy cells from coming into contact with the toxin. HIV, on the other hand, is small and it sifts through these filters, thus exposing it to the toxin.

Unlike other approaches, which work to prevent HIV from replicating, Wickline's technique involves the degradation of the virus's structure.

"We are attacking an inherent physical property of HIV," said Joshua L. Hood through a university statement, and a co-author of the study. "Theoretically, there isn't any way for the virus to adapt to that. The virus has to have a protective coat, a double-layered membrane that covers the virus."

Interestingly, the concept behind the melittin nanoparticle approach could conceivably work against other diseases, including hepatitis B and C.

Eventually, the topical gel could be combined with a spermicidal contraceptive and act as a kind of two-in-one double-whammy. But for now, the researchers say that the nanoparticles are safe for sperm, and will initially be intended for couples who are trying to conceive.

And as for the study itself, it's the first proof-of-concept that the therapeutic and safe application of a nanoparticle-mediated compound can combat HIV-1.

Supplementary source: Washington University.

You can read the entire study in Antiviral Therapy.

**-Loki-**

Mannahnin wrote:
There's nothing inherently scary about heights (if you're on secure footing) or most spiders or snakes, either.

That's why they're referred to as phobias - irrational fears. I'm Arachnophobic (which is doubly irritating living in Australia). When I see a Huntsman on the wall, I know the most it could do it give me a painful bite. That doesn't stop me being utterly terrified of the thing.