Switch Theme:

What do you want to see in the new [Insert Un-Updated Army] 6th Edition Codex?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Archmagos Veneratus Extremis




On the Internet

 Troike wrote:
ClockworkZion wrote:
In my experiances the Repentia are useful, assuming you can get them into combat.

I've heard that they're too often a suicide unit (which is appropriate, mind you), and pretty much require their AoF to deal damage. Problematic, considering that the current faith system isn't too great.

But yeah, I should have said "more useful". Most of those units have their uses, they're just not usually good choices in a competetive list.


Repentia eat entire pretty much anything that isn't a high I assault unit. Overwatch and a lack of assault transport options are their real weaknesses. If the Sisters can't get an assault transport making Repentia a 5-20 unit size would work. It'd be more fitting to the fluff for some Orders that way too.

 ZebioLizard2 wrote:
Well it really wasn't much of an update, sure things got added and some things changed, but it still feels like it wants to play in 4th edition with most of the army, aside from heldrakes which is keeping it afloat.


"Not much of an update" is 6th in a nutshell. If the rumors of 6th being a long edition they want to keep around for a while we could easily see expansions or even 6.5 ed codexes that add more to the game.

Frankly, for the most part, all the 6th ed books are in a rough balance with each other. It's not perfect mind you, but it's better than it's been and despite the lamenting that some of the CSM players will never stop repeating, the CSM book isn't in a bad place. Yes, I will agree that some of the internal balance is still bad, but I won't agree that just because some units seem like "must haves" that they're the only useful things in the book.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: