Switch Theme:

What do you consider as 40k canon or fluff?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Eternally-Stimulated Slaanesh Dreadnought





I normally look at the codexs and the books. If someone can make a good reason for something I am more inclined to do rule of cool.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/10/24 18:04:45


 
   
Made in us
[MOD]
Solahma






RVA

Anything published or licensed by GW is fair game in a discussion about fluff. There is no such thing as 40k canon.

   
Made in us
Deathwing Terminator with Assault Cannon





Gillette Wyoming

Da krimson barun wrote:

And makari the grot being dead.
Or that I don't like.(But I like most of It.MOST of it..)


Hence why I havent read any of the HH Lion stuff, I like having the illusion the Lion may be the traitor (HEY BL QUIT RUINING THE REASON I CHOSE DARK ANGELS!!!!)

More importantly where does this makari come from, sounds funny


DA 4000 points W/L/D 6e 3/2/0
IG 1500 points W/L/D 6e 0/2/0
And 100% Primed!  
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Background
Go to: