Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

"Before you staft playing, it's always worth taking the time to talk to your opponent about the terrain you're using. You want to be sure that you're both clear on how you're going to treat all your terrain pieces before the game starts" (91)

 DeathReaper wrote:
"Before you staft playing, it's always worth taking the time to talk to your opponent about the terrain you're using. You want to be sure that you're both clear on how you're going to treat all your terrain pieces before the game starts" (91)

Indeed, and to change a terrain from what the rules state to something else is HIWPI. Again, your argument fails rules wise.

RAW: who gives a gak

HIWPI: Yep crush that gak

Fragile wrote:

 DeathReaper wrote:
"Before you staft playing, it's always worth taking the time to talk to your opponent about the terrain you're using. You want to be sure that you're both clear on how you're going to treat all your terrain pieces before the game starts" (91)

Indeed, and to change a terrain from what the rules state to something else is HIWPI. Again, your argument fails rules wise.

Did you not read what I wrote?

"This is why my friends and I play the Gun as impassible terrain. It is really the only way to do it that does not create ridiculous situations like this."

I literally said this is how we play it. (Though it is based on rules)

Treating the Terrain as a model is not based on rules at all.

I read what you wrote and then commented that playing it as a model also solves those situations. You chose to argue the point. Your HIWPI has no more basis in rules than anyone else's

Fragile wrote:
I read what you wrote and then commented that playing it as a model also solves those situations. You chose to argue the point. Your HIWPI has no more basis in rules than anyone else's

But playing it as a model does not solve anything, in fact creates more issues with the rules.

Most would prefer to cause the least amount of issues with their House rules and treating the Gun as Impassible accomplishes this task.