Switch Theme:

Why use chainswords on bikers?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in au
Boom! Leman Russ Commander





Brisbane, Australia

 dmthomas7 wrote:
It's simple the bp is a the marines CC weapon. You may swap for a chainsword if you prefer it aesthetically. the difference between the two for a biker marine is none. There is no reason to not fire the TL bolters on the bike since you are relentless on a bike a can charge regardless. The only reason for the swap to chainsword is to allow it to be further swapped for a special weapon as they forgot to allow bikes to properly take special weapons. as the wargear entry is written you may only swap a melee weapon or bolter for a special weapon.

They technically do not need a bolt pistol on the bikes to begin with but every marine has a bolt pistol and GW likes to keep up basic themes throughout their armies.


Unfortunately, a bolt pistol is not a CCW for the purposes of these rules. a BP is a Bolt Pistol, Like a boltgun is a bolt gun and not simply classed as a "ranged weapon".

The Reason some of these options read Close Combat Weapon is because not every joe dick and harry carries a standard chainsword. Librarians, for example, carry a force weapon, or Chaplains, which carry a power weapon, and yet have access to these options.

 
   
Made in ca
Regular Dakkanaut





A pistol can be a close combat weapon, from a fluff perspective anyways (pistol whipping, or just jam the barrel into the guys ribs and pull the trigger).

From a gaming perspective though, the pistol is the superior choice. As someone above said, you can choose to fire the pistol instead of your bike mounted TL bolters for those (admitedly ULTRA RARE) times when you might cause so many casualties with the TL boltguns that you could fail a charge whereas the pistols would cause half as many casualties and maybe still allow a charge.

Yeah, grabbing at straws there but it is a technically real in game reason to use a BP vs a chainsword. :-)

9500 
   
Made in us
Veteran Wolf Guard Squad Leader




San Diego, CA

[quote=Thairne the chainsword I get +1 A in CC, whereas the pistol might enable me to charge (and hide in CC)?


also on the note of the attack, you can fire bike bolters or even a special weapon rapid fire and still charge because bikes confer the relentless special rule.

 
   
Made in ca
Lieutenant Colonel






 Baines4652 wrote:
Page 51 of the rules states.

"If a model is not specifically stated as having a weapon with the melee type, it is treated as being armed with a single CCW.

The profile is S=user and AP=nil

I take from that every model has this regardless unless it states in a models profile is dose not.

So I take from this if a biker has a bolt pistol he has 2 CCW weapons and gains the plus 1 attack.

you only treat them as having a single CCW when they are not stated as having one...

the marine is stated as having one already, he does not get a 2nd unstated one,

and yes, a pistol is a melee weapon as well, so you dont get a bonus CCW weapon.... pistols have a melee weapon profile, hence are melee weapons... simple really.

even if pistols were not, the model would still be "counted as armed with a single CCW" not two

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2014/01/09 03:47:56


 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: