Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/14 13:37:41
Subject: Canadian teen convicted of 'sexting' photos of boyfriend's ex
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Seaward wrote: kronk wrote:It doesn't matter how old the kid is that distributed the child porn. Child pornography is child pornography.
Would that apply to the 15 year-old in the pictures, herself?
I'd say so. Though, obviously a much lesser charge than the "new gf" as I said earlier, there should be some investigation as to HOW the photos of her ended up on the boy's phone. If they were transmitted, then she's guilty. If they weren't, then they could probably get away with doing nothing.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/14 14:26:52
Subject: Re:Canadian teen convicted of 'sexting' photos of boyfriend's ex
|
 |
Hooded Inquisitorial Interrogator
|
Well, society usually has no interest in punishing minors for "exploring their sexuality" in absence of exploitative behaviour, and would indeed come into conflict with basic personal freedoms in doing so. Both the girl who took these pictures of herself and the boy seem to fall under this category.
The second girl, who made these pictures available to a group of third parties, clearly had malicious intent and was exploiting the nature of these pictures. Those are sufficient grounds for prosecution.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/14 16:22:17
Subject: Canadian teen convicted of 'sexting' photos of boyfriend's ex
|
 |
Battlefield Tourist
MN (Currently in WY)
|
azazel the cat wrote:Age of consent in Canada is 16, except in the case of anal sex in which case it is 18.
.
I wonder why the different ages for different types? Is there a different age of consent for Oral?
Does anyone else find this strange?
|
Support Blood and Spectacles Publishing:
https://www.patreon.com/Bloodandspectaclespublishing |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/14 16:23:31
Subject: Canadian teen convicted of 'sexting' photos of boyfriend's ex
|
 |
5th God of Chaos! (Yea'rly!)
The Great State of Texas
|
I just want to know why he knows this...
|
-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/01/14 16:26:23
Subject: Canadian teen convicted of 'sexting' photos of boyfriend's ex
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Easy E wrote: azazel the cat wrote:Age of consent in Canada is 16, except in the case of anal sex in which case it is 18.
.
I wonder why the different ages for different types?
Maybe the people who wrote those laws were hoping that two more years of no (anal) sex makes everybody choose not to be gay?
"I really want to have the gay sex, but I don't want to wait until I'm 18. Maybe I'll just be straight instead and have vaginal sex right now!"
|
|
 |
 |
|