Frazzled wrote:Once someone elects the defense of self defense, it should not be the State's burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it WASN'T self defense.
Self-defense is an affirmative defense, which means the defendant has the burden of proof. What you seem to be saying is that, in addition to having the burden to prove the elements of murder the state should also have the burden to disprove any self-defense claim. That doesn't make any sense to me.
EDIT: Nevermind -- I totally missed the word "not" in your sentence!